the REAL MC COY

YOU DO NOT HAVE TO SE THE U>S> GOVERNMENT TO BE RIGHT. I AM NOT SUING THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ACCORDING TO 42USC 1983 the PERSON OR ENTITY LIABLE ARE the person (s) or entities committing THE ACT (added) WHETHER MALFEASANCE, MISFEASANCE OR NON-FEASANCE. ONLY EMPLOYEES THAT REFUSED TO OBEY THE LAW. BELOW ARE THE TEN ALLEGED FRAUDS AS PRESENTED TO CNN ND TA FEW SALIENT VIOLATIONS TO PROVE MY POINT AS VIDEO TAPED HERE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMMUt5MemFg I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO TALK FOR A LONG TIME AND I WAS OBSTRUCTED NOW HERE IT COMES FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH . A NATURALIZED AMERICAN CITIZEN AND NATIVE OF HAITI REPORTING. A FORMER MULTI-MILLIONAIRE SELF-MADE in AMERICA ONE WHO HAS BEEN DEPRIVED of HIS HUMAN RIGHTS, HIS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN THE U.S. some of the salient torts in the case for which the compelling constitutional conflict would be bigger than the United States can contain: 1) EXTRINSIC FRAUDS A MAJOR RED FLAG AT THE START WOULD SEND EVERYBODY SEARCHING for such departure derails the pocess at the start, vitiates the process and create the case for a miscarriage of justice it was extrinsic frauds that moved all three prongs of investigative conspiracy, namely the MALFEASANCE, the MISFEASANCE abd THE NON-FEASANCE, AND NO RULE 56 APPLIED AND NO RULE 59 APPLIED AND NO RULE 60 -B APPLIED AND NO WAIVER GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF WHICH IS INVOLUNTARY WAIVERS A MAJOR TRANGRESSION OF THE LAW WHEN A JUDGE IS FAILING TO INFORM THE PARTIES. AND NO DUE PROCESS ANALYZED AT AL SO SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS WERE ALSO MISSING ON THE RECORDS. MAKING DECISIONS FOR OTHER UNITED STATES CITIZENS. THAT IS SHEER UNDERGROUND STUFF AND THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES BARRSUCH FALACIES I WILL NOT DRINK SUCH LIES UNDER OATH AND THE U.N WILL NOT EITHER AS THEY TOLD ME. 2) NO FBI CONTACTED: THAT WAS SHEER OBSTRUCTIO FOR JUDGES TO HAVE SUCH A CASE EHAOS THE FIRST TIME INTHEIR IFE TIME I WOULD CALL ALL AGAENIES TO COMPARE NOTES INSTEAD OF TAJING ALL THESE MATTERS IN MYHANDS. THE FBI WAS AVAIBLE AS OUR GREATEST SYSTEMIC TOOLS AND NOT CONTACTED. THE ROYS OW PROPERIN AN AREA THAT HITORICALLY HAS BEEN RACIALLY SEGREGATED. AND THE DOJ HAS NO IDEA LIK FREEDOM SHOULD OBTRCTION RULED THE DAY AND TAINTWED EVRYTING IN ITS PATH. AS IT PERCOLATES EVERYWHERE AND OTHER OFFICIALS THOUHHT ) if the judges are found right the State OF FLORIDA would bEin violation of TITLE SIX OF THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT AND THAT IS SERIOUS FOR SO MANY YEARS. NO RULE 56 APPLIED AND NO RULE 59 APPLIED AND NO RULE 60 -B APPLIED AND NO WAIVER GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF WHICH IS INVOLUNTARY WAIVERS A MAJOR TRANGRESSION OF THE LAW WHEN A JUDGE IS FAILING TO INFORM THE PARTIES. AND NO DUE PROCESS ANALYZED AT AL SO SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS WERE ALSO MISSING ON THE RECORDS. MAKING DECISIONS FOR OTHER UNITED STATES CITIZENS. THAT IS SHEER UNDERGROUND STUFF AND THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES BARRSUCH FALACIES I WILL NOT DRINK SUCH LIES UNDER OATH AND THE U.N WILL NOT EITHER AS THEY TOLD ME. this is not something to try at home for any human being who do something like that threatens the srecurity of America nd also the United Nations having more than 130 supportIng members in it TAKE ALL THEIR CLUES FRO THE UNITED STATES. I CANNOT INGEST THIS I ACNNOT MASTICATE SUCH I CANNOT SALIVATE IT AND I CANNOT DIGEST IT EITHER IT MUST GO BCLK THAT IS THE LAW AND THE LAW IS ALL I HAVE. SUCH LIES UNDER OATH, WILL NOT MAKE THE U.N EASY AND HAPPY. WFOR GOOD CAUSE AS THEY TOLD ME. 3) NO DA OFFICE INVOLVED AND AVAILABLE TO ALL AUTHORITIES NO RULE 56 APPLIED AND NO RULE 59 APPLIED AND NO RULE 60 -B APPLIED AND NO WAIVER GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF WHICH IS INVOLUNTARY WAIVERS A MAJOR TRANGRESSION OF THE LAW WHEN A JUDGE IS FAILING TO INFORM THE PARTIES. AND NO DUE PROCESS ANALYZED AT AL SO SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS WERE ALSO MISSING ON THE RECORDS. MAKING DECISIONS FOR OTHER UNITED STATES CITIZENS. THAT IS SHEER UNDERGROUND STUFF AND THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES BARRSUCH FALACIES I WILL NOT DRINK SUCH LIES UNDER OATH AND THE U.N WILL NOT EITHER AS THEY TOLD ME. . 4) NO HUD STEERING VIOLATIONS APPLIED AT ALL. THE HUD IS LIVID ABOUT ITS LAWS LOW KEY INDIVIDUALS MAY NOT KNOW THE LAWS BUT SEASONED PEOPLE KNOW AD THERE IS NO TLREANCE FOR MISLEADING ALL COURTS IN THE U.S. NO RULE 56 APPLIED AND NO RULE 59 APPLIED AND NO RULE 60 -B APPLIED AND NO WAIVER GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF WHICH IS UINVOLUNTARY WAIVERS. THAT IS SHEER UNDERGROUND STUFF AND THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES BARR SUCH FALACIES. NO WHERE IN THE LAW DOE IT SAY THE CITIZEN OF THE U.S MUST CCEPT ALL LIKE THAT BU=Y THE WAY THE JUDGES AE NOT THE COURT AND IF THEY ERR THEY CAN BE CORRECTED BY THE NOBLES OF JUSTICES. I WILL NOT DRINK SUCH LIES UNDER OATH AND THE U.N WILL NOT EITHER AS THEY TOLD ME. 5) - NO FCC INVOLVED AT ALL AND YET, AVAIABLANBLE TO ALL. NO RULE 56 APPLIED AND NO RULE 59 APPLIED AND NO RULE 60 -B APPLIED AND NO WAIVER GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF WHICH IS INVOLUNTARY WAIVERS A MAJOR TRANGRESSION OF THE LAW WHEN A JUDGE IS FAILING TO INFORM THE PARTIES. AND NO DUE PROCESS ANALYZED AT AL SO SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS WERE ALSO MISSING ON THE RECORDS. MAKING DECISIONS FOR OTHER UNITED STATES CITIZENS. THAT IS SHEER UNDERGROUND STUFF AND THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES BARRSUCH FALACIES I WILL NOT DRINK SUCH LIES UNDER OATH AND THE U.N WILL NOT EITHER AS THEY TOLD ME. 6) EXTRINSIC FRAUDS SET UP IN THISSHEER BSTRUCTION CASE . THERE IS A TRAP SET IN THIS CASE AND THE GOD OF HEAVEN ALREADY DEMONSTRATED TO ME THAT SOMEONE SITS IN A CORNER IS TRYING TO DISPARAGE YOU TO THEIR OWN ADVANTAGE MEANING WHATEVER SHOULD GO IN THEIR COLUMN THEY ARE BRINGING IT ON YOU SO THIS LAST MOTION IS TRICKLY LIMITED TO FINALITY NOT FURTHER ARGUMENTS AS SUCH WOULD RENDER THIS MOTION NULL AND VOID THEIS IS DESIGNED SIMPLY FOR FINALITY AND NOT FO FURTHER DCUSSIONS FOR TOO MUCH ILLS HAVE BEEN DONE AND I WILL NOT SUFFER SUCH ANY LONGER. FURTHERMORE NO RULE 56 APPLIED AND NO RULE 59 APPLIED AND NO RULE 60 -B APPLIED AND NO WAIVER GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF WHICH IS INVOLUNTARY WAIVERS A MAJOR TRANGRESSION OF THE LAW WHEN A JUDGE IS FAILING TO INFORM THE PARTIES. AND NO DUE PROCESS ANALYZED AT AL SO SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS WERE ALSO MISSING ON THE RECORDS. MAKING DECISIONS FOR OTHER UNITED STATES CITIZENS. THAT IS SHEER UNDERGROUND STUFF AND THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES BARRSUCH FALACIES I WILL NOT DRINK SUCH LIES UNDER OATH AND THE U.N WILL NOT EITHER AS THEY TOLD ME. 7) NO DOJ INVOLVED YET, AVAILABLE TO ALL ND I WILL NOT STAND FOR SUCH TRANSGRESSIONS ASA U.S CITIZEN IF THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT IS INVOLVED AND THE DOJ ENSURES THAT THE COUNTRY STAYS CURRENT HOW COME THEY WERE NEVER CONTACTED ? NO RULE 56 APPLIED AND NO RULE 59 APPLIED AND NO RULE 60 -B APPLIED AND NO WAIVER GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF WHICH IS INVOLUNTARY WAIVERS A MAJOR TRANGRESSION OF THE LAW WHEN A JUDGE IS FAILING TO INFORM THE PARTIES. AND NO DUE PROCESS ANALYZED AT AL SO SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS WERE ALSO MISSING ON THE RECORDS. MAKING DECISIONS FOR OTHER UNITED STATES CITIZENS. THAT IS SHEER UNDERGROUND STUFF AND THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES BARRSUCH FALACIES I WILL NOT DRINK SUCH LIES UNDER OATH AND THE U.N WILL NOT EITHER AS THEY TOLD ME. 8) NO INVESTAGATON AT ALL: HAD THE FBI OURDREM TEAN WERE INVOLVED IN MINUTES THEY WOULD HAVE DISCOVERED THEPRESECEOF A WANTED FIUGITIVEAND WOULDTAKE TE NECESSARY STEPS TO SECURE TE NATION GAIN> THAT WAS NOT DONE AND INSTED< PEOPLE ARE PARASCOPING ME WITH THEITR CEL PHONE AND SME WILL BBE LITERALLY ARRESTED AS MY ATTRNEYS WANT T DO NOE THYA HAVE NO PROBBLE CAU NO WARANT AND MY FACE IS ALL OVER THEIR CELL PHONE THE FOURRTH AMENDMENT FORBIDS THIS YOUR FACE IS AN INTEGRAL ART OF YOUR BEING. A MAN IS INNOCENT AS THE WALTON COUNTY DECKARED ME TO BE A MAN IS INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY NOT UNTIL MADE GUILTY NOT UNTILL GOUNFD GILTY A GENTEAN < THE OTHER DAY THOUGHT H KNEWMORE AD ADVANCED THAT CRAZY IDEA THAT WAS THE RECVERSE A MAN IS GUILTY UTIL PROVEN INNOCENT THE AN SIMLT Y REVERSED THE LAW ON MY FACE WHAT IF I DID NOT KNOW AI WOULD GO AROUND AD REPET INSANITIES. WHEN WE DO NOT NOW THAT IS OK. BUT WE MUST SEEK TO KNOW THE TRUTH. NO INVESTIGATION DONE AND A FUGITIVE ON THE LOOSE THAT IS WHY I INsIST ON HAVING AN INVESTIGATION. 9) NO 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT TITE SIX REGARDS AT ALL . THAT ACT WAS SO SUBLIME WHEN CONGRESS PASSED IT. THE BULLET PROOF VEST WAS SHATTERED BY THE JUDGES AND I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY IT HAPPENED IN THIS FASHION. AND THE JUDGES DECLARED: THE ROYS OWN PROPERTY IN AN AREA THAT HISTORICALLY HAS BEEN RCIALY SEGREAGATED THE JUDGES STATED A FACT IN MY VIEW THE ROYS OWN THAT IS A FACT THAT I KNOW THE REST IS JARGN TO ME UNTIL THE FBI DOES THEIR WORK. . SUPPOSE YOU MET ME ONTHE STREET AND AFTER SAYING YOUR REGULAR SALUTATIONS YOU ASKED ME HOW IS YOUR LITTLE SON DOING IN SCHOOL? IS HE STILL NUMBER ONE IN MATH IN THE STATE OF MARYLAMD? AND I ANSWERED THUS, AH! MY SON USED TO BE A STRAIGHT A STUDENT AND NUMBER ONE WHEN I LIVED WITH HIM THAT WOULD BE AN AUTOMATIC PAST IN LINGUISTIC BY THE WAY HE IS REGARDLESS, THE LITTLE FELLOW IS BRIGHT. . . . BUT SUPPOSE YOU MET ME AND ASKED HOW IS YOUR SON DOING IN SCHOOL? AND I SAID THUS: MY SON HISTORICALLY HAS BEEN A STRAIGHT "A" STUDENT THAT IS A PERFECT LINGUISTICAL STATEMENT DENOTING THAT HE CONTINUES TO NE STRAIGHT A REGARDLESS OF THE TUMULTUOUS SEPARATION HERE WITH MY WIFE AND WE HAVE BEEN TOGETHER AT THE AGE FF THIRTEEN DO YOU NOW SEE THE CONFLICT.? THE JUDGES EMITTED SMETHING HERE THT POSSIBLYCSN OUT EVE THE UNITED STATES BACK AGAINST THE WALL. BEYOND THE U.S. THERE ARE MORE THAN 130 MENBER NATIONS AND IF AMERICA SETS THE PACE BCAUSE OF WHAT THE JUDGES DID DON'T YOU THINK THEY CAN FOLLOW THROUGH? AND THEY CAN DO IT WIYTH IMPUNITY IF THE US OR THE STATE O FORIDA PER THE NON-MARGINAL STATEMENT ID IT. WE HAVE AN INTERNATIONAL PROBLEMS HERE IN MY VIEW. THT CA BE ADDRESSED BY THE U.S. FOR WE HAVE THE STRINGST JUDICIAL IN THE WOLD OUR PREMENMINANCE OF JUSTICE IS SUGHT AFTER AND OUR VENEER OF DEMOCRACY IS IN HIGH DMAND W CAN D THIS HOME THAT IS ONE OF THE RESONS IT TOOK ME A LONG TIME 10) NO CIA YET, AVAILABLE AND NOT USED TO OBSTRUCT, WE MUST REDUCE THE KEVL T ALL THE JUDGES FAILEDME GREATLY FOR ) IT WAS EXTRINCSUC FRAUDS THA SKIPPED THE CIANOT TOMING; Extrinsic fraud is fraud that "induces one not to present a case in court or deprives one of the opportunity to be heard [or] is not involved in the actual issues . 9)NO DA OFFICE) IT WAS EXTRINSIC FRAUDS THAT REFUSED THE ASSISTACE OF THE DA OFICE WITH A WANTED FUGITIVE ATTHE CENTER STAGE AND NOBODY CARED THE WALTON COUNTY USED A WANTED FUGITIVE POSSIBLY HSRBORED SUCH WOULD CAUSE THE GREAT FBI AGENTS TO FROWN A WANTED FUGITIVE IS A DANGER TO OUR CHILDREN THAT WAS EXTRINSIC FRAUDS CLEARLY TO DEVIATE THE PROCESS AND PLACE TE SPOTLIGHT ON THEWANTED FUGITIVE, THIS WANTED FUGITIVE OR EXTRNSIC FRAUFD IS ABOUT TO PERCOLATE THE ENTIRE RECORD AND I LOST MORE THAN FIFTEEN MIILION DOLLARS IN THAT GAME I CALL IT THE UNDERGROUNDS GAME WHILE I WAS LOOSING MORE THAN FIFTEEN MILLIONS DOLLARS ON AMERIVAN SOIL AND THE LOSS OF AFFECTION WITH MY WIFE OF THIRTY FIVRE YEARS IT WAS EXTRINSIC FRAUDS THATDESPISED THE HOMELAND SECURITY IT WAS EXTRINSIC FRAUDS THAT REMOVED THE HUD OUT IF ITSPLACE IT WAS EXTRINSIC FRAUDS THAT FAILED THE FCC FOR GRAMMATICAL ERROR AND TRUTHFULNESS 11) NO HUD INVOLVED AT ALL THAT COULD CURB THE JUDGES GOOD SENSES ON NOT TOUCHING THE FEDERAL 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT. IT WAS EXTRINSIC FRAUDS THAT NEARLY DESTROYED MY CIONFIDENCE IN THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROCESS WEREN'IT FOR THE NEW BOOK I AM WRITING TEACHING THAT THERE IS A VAST DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE CLEAR AMERICA THAT PRESIDEBNT OBANA WANT TO LAST AND THE UNDERGROUNDS WHERE PEOPLE MAKE THEMSELVES THE STANDARD AND THERE IS NO LAW LADIES AND GEBNTLEMEN INTROIDUCING THE SECOND AMERICA WHERE EVERY THING GOES AND I CALLED IT NOT AMERICA AT ALL BUT UNDERGROUNDS it was extrund=siuc frauds to by pass thefbi so rigid uin their investigative process that is systemic by the U.S. Government to oce a plaintiff or defendant to change ther view or interprate the facts in a Different way. Extrinsic frauds were the pavers of this case that lead solely to frauds from the start an frauds unresponded an unsanswered. LIKE THE TEN FRAUDS UPON THE COURT OIN THIS CASE. AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: Extrinsic fraud is fraud that "induces one not to present a case in court or deprives one of the opportunity to be heard [or] is not involved in the actual issues ...." It can involve fraud on the court, but is not necessarily the same. for instance when the WALTON COUNTY defendants declare themselves the winner such derailed the whole case for it was accepted by the arbitrating Judges. that was a false declaration since it was prior to me searching the case more thoroughly to find the missing components. 1) EXTRINSIC FRAUDS EXISTED in MANY AEAS INDICATED THE MALICIOUSNESS OF THIS CASE. 2) Extrinsic frauds eisted at the start with the presence of a fraudulent Fugitive pausing for the Walton County against the will of the FBI. 3) EXTRINSIC FRAUDS EXISTED on may11 2005, whn thre was no o presente at all 12) perjury WHAT IS PERJURY? Perjury is the criminal offense of lying under oath. A perjury charge may be brought when someone makes a false statement after being sworn in or promising to tell the truth in a legal situation. For instance, a person giving testimony on the stand during a court case who tells a lie may be charged with perjury. Someone who lies during a deposition, or who lies on a signed declaration or affidavit can also be charged with this offense 13) FELONY WHAT IS IT?Criminal fines may also be imposed for felony charges, often in the amounts of thousands of dollars. Under traditional common law, felonies were called “true crimes,” and usually included serious offenses such as: homicide, rape, arson, burglary, robbery, larceny, escaping from a prison, and assisting in a felony.Sep 8, 2015 felonies were called IN THE LD DAYS “true crimes,” and usually included serious offenses such as: homicide, rape, arson, burglary, robbery, larceny, escaping from a prison, and assisting in a felony.Sep 8, 2015 I LOST MY PROPERTY AN THAT WAS APRAISED WITH THE COLLATERA;L AT OVER FIFTEEN MILLIONS DOLLARS there WILL BE VARIOUS COUNTS OF FELONY AND THEY ARE CRIMESTTEMPTED AND COMMITTED HERE. 14) FORGERY CHARGES The penalty for forgery, counterfeiting or, altering documents and instruments often varies according to the type of document altered, with important government documents at the top of the penalty list. forgery (also known as "uttering a false instrument") is a serious offense, punishable as a felony in all fifty states and by the federal government. Forgery involves the making, altering, use, or possession of a false writing in order to commit a fraud. It can occur in many forms, from signing another person's name on a check to falsifying one's own academic transcript. When the subject of forgery is currency, it is also called counterfeiting. The rule thus expressly provides that either intrinsic or extrinsic fraud will constitute ground for upsetting a judgment if a motion is made within one year. But whether not only extrinsic but also intrinsic fraud will constitute sufficient ground for upsetting a judgment after the expiration of the year period is uncertain. The plain language of the rule seems to give AND THE JUDGS REFUSED TO REOPEN THE UNAVISABKE JUDGEENT SINCE OCTOBER 2011. USING THE DOCTRINE OF ATTRITIION THY DELAYEDEVERYTHING TILL NOW I JUTCAN'T FATHOME SUCH WHILE GIVING carte blanche to a court to grant relief at anytime for any type of fraud. But recent judicial interpretations of the rule point out questions that deserve onsideration deserve consideration eisted on may 12, when the county used the fugitive document 2). 3) PERJURY: We can’t always be certain, but those who are caught knowingly misleading a court face serious criminal charges of perjury. To “perjure” yourself is to knowingly make false or misleading statements under oath or to sign a legal document you know to be false or misleading. You visited this page on 11/12/15. AND THEY ARE CRIMES 4) FORGERY: the action of forging or producing a copy of a document, signature, banknote, or work of art. counterfeiting, falsification, faking, copying, pirating "guilty of forgery"a forged or copied document, signature, banknote, or work of art fake, counterfeit, fraud, sham, imitation, replica, copy, pirate copy; informalphony "the painting was a forgery 6) 5) NO NOTICE BY THE FOURTH AMENDMENT NO PROBABLE CAUSE BY THE FOURTH AMENDMENT 7) NO SEARCH BY THE FOURTH AMENDMENT • . plural noun: forgeries synonyms " 6) NO WRITTEN COMPLAINTS ON MAY 11, 2005 7) NO F.I.R. BY ALL INVESTIGATIVE BODIES 8) NO F.B.BI. INVOLVED AT ALL AND AN INVESTGATION WAS DONE ACCORDING TO MRS. PATBLACKSHEAR 9) NO CIA INVOLVED OR REQUESTED AT ALL 10) NO INVITATION TO COME ON MY PROPERTY TRESPASSING IN OCTOBER 2004 AND MAY 2005 11) NO HOMELAND SECURITY INVOLVED 12) NO FCC INVOLVED 13) NO HUD INVOLVED 14) MALICIOUS PROSECUTION NOT TO BE ATTACHED TO fEDERAL JUSDGES AMD CRIMINAL LAWERS 15) GRAND LARCENY :Larceny is a crime involving the unlawful taking of the personal property of another person. It was an offence under the common law of England and became an offence in jurisdictions which incorporated the common law of England into their own law. THERE ARE PETTY LARCENIES AND GRAND LARCENY I BELIVE FOR THE sTATE OF FLORIDA WHEN EVER VTHE PROPERTY LOST EXCEEDS $1,000 IT IS CONSUDERED GRAND LARCENY Overview of Florida Theft Laws: Florida laws use the legal term "theft" to describe a variety of property crimes, including larceny, stealing, misappropriation, conversion, and other offenses. In general, theft involves the unauthorized taking or use of another person's property. In a theft case, the prosecutor must prove several elements of the crime. - See more at: http://statelaws.findlaw.com/florida-law/florida-theft-laws.html#sthash.xAuXxtLc.dpuf 16) no JURY TRIAL THE CHIEF JUDGE PROMISED AND SCHEDULED JURY TRIAL TWICE AND IT WAS ABORTED OR NEGLCTED WITHOUT PROPWER WAIVERS ASA LAW SATUDENT TO BE I KNOW OF VTHE GRAVITY OF DOINGTHINGS WITH OUT WIVERS AND LEAVING PEOPLE DOUNBTING THE COUTRT'S INTEGRITY SO W HAVE TWO TORTS IN ONE NO JURY TH OTHER NO WAIVER: SUCH OBSTRUCT JUTICE AND LEAVS A LOT OF QUESTIONS IN THE MINDS OF THE LITIGANTS. BVIOLATIONS OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT AND THE INVOLUNTARY WAIVER RIGHTS. 17) NO IMPARTIAL ARBITER : A FAITHFUL ARBITER WILL NOT BE CORERCED TO OVERLOOK IN NONFESANCE THE ACT OF MALFEASANCE. THERE WAS CLEAR BIAS ON THE RECORD AND I SEPTEMBER 25 2008 ITWAS CONFIRMED BY THE BEHAVIORAL MISCONDUCT OF THE CHIEF JUDGE SHE STATED TO TH AUDIENCE OF WHICH I WA THE SOLE BLACK MAN THAT IT IS OK FO ANY BODY NOT TO WANT SOME PEOPLE TO LIVE NEXT DOOR AND I AM THE SOLE BLACK MAN WHAT DO YOU MEAN SHEER RACIAL BIAS. 18) NO WAIVERS AT ALL THE CHIEF JUDGE WAS SO ARROGANT THTOWARD ME THAT SJHE DID NOT STOP AT ALL TO SEE WHAT SHE WQAS DOING IFSHE WERE IGORANT THAT WOULD BE UBNDERSTANDABL BUT THE CHIEF IS A JD JUGS AND JD JUGES IN TE uNITED STATES ARE HIGHLY COMPETENT AD I AM UNDER OATH HERE FOR THE CHIEF JUDGE WERE SHE IGNORANT WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO CONCOCT SUCH DAMNING COUP TO MY PEOPLE MY RACE MY COLOR AND Y NATIONAL ORGIN CMING UP. 19) NO RULE 56 BY THE JUDGES AND SUMMARY JUDMENT WAS ENTERED. LISTN PEOPLE NO SUMMARY JUDGMENR CAN BE ENTERED WITHOUT RULE 56 IT IS LIKE A STRAINERWHNE SQUEEZING ORANGES TO MAKE JUICE IF NO STRAINER THEN ALL TH RESIDUE WOULD GO IN THE JUICE THE UNITED STATES HAS LAWS AND THE JUDGES ARE NOT THE LAWS OF THE U.S. TO THE DEGREE THE JUDGE COMPLIES WITH THE LAW HE OR SHE CAN BE THE 850 LBS GUERILLAS BUT BO LAWS A JUDGE IS LIK EA FEATHER ALL JUDGES TAKE THE LWS TO ACCUSE ANYBODY . THEREFORE I CHARGE TH JUDGES IN MISFEASANCE HERE FOR THEY ATTEMPTED TO PERVERT THE SYSTEM TO THEIR OWN INTEREST TO IT THE WALTON COUNTY. 20) DISCRIMINATION THE 11TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATED THAT DISCRIMINATION WOULD NOT BE TOLERATED THTIS WHAT I WENT THORUGH AFTER THEY STTAED SO THEY SAID THEY WENT THROUGH MY CASE AND EVR FOUND ANY DISCRIMINATION AND THE MOST PALPABLE TRANSGRESSION IS AGANST ME. IS THE LAW EQUAL OR AM I DEALING WIYTH UNDERGROUNDS MENTALITY HERRE AND LAWLESS AMERICA THAT REFUSES TO BE CAUGHT . A LAWSUIT ACCORDING TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IS NOT A GAME OF SKILL WHERE ONE PERSON CAN LOOSE BCAUSE OF A MISTAKE THE COURT DECALARES. I DO NOT KNOW WHAT HAPPENED HERE MAY BE THE FEDERAL JUDGES THOUGHT OF MY COUNTRY NATIONAL ORIGIN MY COMPLEXION DARK ON MY SKIN AN MY RACE BEING BLACK THE THREE AND DECIDED I AM NOT A CITIZEN THERE FORE I COULD NOT BE TREATED AS A CITIZEN THR IS NO BIG I AND LITTLE US IN COURT URA LEX SED LEX THE LATIN SAYS TH LAW IS HARD BUT IT IS THE LAW. 21) DISCRIMINATION COUNT II FURTHERMORE SUBSEQUENT TO THIS MAJOR FIASCO BY THE APPEAL COURT WE HAVE ANOTHER MAJOR PROBLEM IF YOU RECALL I JUST SAID THAT THE 11TH CIRCUIT COURT O APPEAL STATED THRE WAS NO DISCRIMINATION AT ALL HRE IS COUNT #2 THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF THE COMMISSIONERS MR. SCOTT BRANNON WAS CAUGHT WITH THE FOLLOWING EXPRESSION IN HIS E-MAIL "HELP A NIGGA OUT" SOMETHING THE FEDERAL COUNSELORS AND AVISOS TOLD ALL THE COMMISSIONERS SINVCE 2009 TO STAY AWAY FROM . NOW IN 2012 SCOTT BRANNON IS CAIGHT AND THAT WAS MAJOR TV CAUGHT. HER IS THE THRILLING CONFESSION OF MR. BRANNON THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BORD OF COMMISSIONERS HOW CAN OUR CLEAN JUGES DEFEND THESE PEOPLE THST WAS THE PROBLEM CLEANESS CANNOT DEFEND UNCLEANNESS IF SUCH TAKS PLACE A TAINTING WILL TAKE FOLLOW INEBVITABLY FOR, AS THE MASTER SO ARE THE SERVANTS.THE 11TH CIRCUIT COURT AOF APPEAL WAS WRONG INMY ESTIMATION. AND I VENTURE TO SA THAT ONCE THE DISTRICT COURT IS VITIATED, THE VITIATION WILL MIGRATE TO OTHER COURTS AND THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED HERE . BY THE WAY IT WOULD BE GOOD TO KNOW WHO THIS GUY IS HE WAS THE OVERSEER OF MY PROPERTIES WHEN LOST CAN YOU PUT TWO PLUS TWO TOGETHER THEN I HIRED A LAWYER TO TALK WITH HIM ESPECIALLY AND I PAID THATLAWYER 850 DOLLARS FOR A FIFTEEN MINUTE CONVERSATION WITH MR. BRANNIN. AND HERE IS THE RESULT HE BROUGHT MR. BRANNON STATED THAT HE DROVE HIS CAR TVLOSE TO MY PROPERTY AND SAW NOTHING WRONG THAT MISTR ROY WAS DOING THAT IS NICE EXCEPT IT DIES THERE. THAT WAS MY NO-LOOK PASS COMMISSIIONER CLOSED HIS YES ON WHAT THE WALTON COUNTY WASDOING TO HURT ME THOUGH HE SAW TH TRUTH BUT HE FAILED TO ANNOUNCE IT LEAVING ME AND FIFTEEN MILLION DOLARS WOTH OF PROPERTIES UNATTENDED I TOLD YOU IN THE TRIANGLE OFFENSE THERE IS A COMBO HERE IS THE COMBO THE WALTON COUNTY WAS APPOINTED IN THIS CABAL TO BE ONLY MALFEASANCE TO COMMIT NEFARIOUS ACT I WANT TO CONTGRATULATE THE RESTON CITY FOR HOSTING THIS AND I WILL MAKE IT KNOW SOON HOW THEY DO NOT KNOW THAT HISTORY IS INTO MAKING RIGHT HERE SOME THINK THT THEY ARE DEALING WITH ME THIS CASE IS GOD ' S CASE AND NOT MINE THAT IS WHAT EVERYTHING IS BNOW FALLING IN PLACE I AM BUT A PION THAT GOD FAVOED TO PLAY A PART IN THIS MOVIE AND I DO NOT EVEN KNOWTH ELINES IAM PLAYING BUT WAIT ON HIM HE IS DOING IT NOT ME AT ALL. HOW CAN THE WALTON COUNTY BE DOING AND COMMITTIMNG MALFEASANCE BY ATTACKING ME AND NON FEASANCE BY NLOOK [ASS THAT IS BEYOND ME. BUT NOW THEY ARE DOING NONFEASANCE A NONFEASANCE IS SUPPOSED TO BE INVISIBLE AN THE WALTON COUNTY IS INVOLVED? HEIN HEIN FOR THE COUNTY THINKS NO ONE IS LOOKING BUT GOD DOES NOT MISS A THING IT IS BLOW PER BLOW IF THE WALTON COUNTY WERE HRE THEY WOULD CRY TEARS BITTERTEARS NEXT WEKK I WILL COLCLOSE THIS POST AND SEND IT OUT BUT I GUARANTEE YOU TH CHIEF JUDGE PERHAPS DOID NOT KNOW WHAT I NOW KNOW FROM =GOD ALMIGHTY HE REBVVEALETH SECRETS TO HIS SERVANTS THE PROPHETS. 22) NEXT MORE COUNTS OF DISCRIMINATION THE U.S. CENSUS BUREAU 2000 REFKECTED THAT IN THE AREA AWHERE MY PROPERTU WAS LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE COMMUNITY IS OWNED OR INHBITED BY BLCKS YOU THINK I WILL RAISE CAN WHER THR IS NO FIRE IF THERE IS FIRE AT THE BOTTOM THERE WILL BE SMOKE ON TOP. THE FEDERAL CENSUS BUREAU CANNOT LIE WHAT YOU SEE AIS WHAT YOU GET. THEY DETERMINE THE AREA AS HAVING PROBLEMS AND THE JUDGES DID NOT KNOW? I WISHED THESE WERE MADE AVAILABL TO ME I WOULD CERTAINLY REFRAIN FROM DOING THE EXPLOITS I STARTED DOWN THERE. 23) NET: MORE COUNT OF DISCRIMINATION THE FEDERAL JUSGES STATED IN WRITING THREE TIMES NO DENYING OF SUCH IS POAASSIBL TTWICE IN 2007 AND ONVCE IN T2009 THAT I OWN PROPERTY IN AN AREA THAT HIS HERE IS THE CONFESSION OF MR. SCOTT BRANNON THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BORD OF COMMISSIONERS IN FLORIDA Under these circumstances … I have not handled myself in a way befitting of someone elected to serve the people of Walton County,” Brannon said in a 10-page statement he read at Tuesday’s County Commission meeting. 24) THIS IS DAMNING THE COURT JUDGES ANRE ENTERING WITHOUTHE FBI, THE HOLAND SECURITY THE FCC THE CIA THE HUD? TEN FRAUDS IS A VERY HIGH NUMBER FOR A NON ATTORNEY TO FIND ANYWHERE. FRAUDS UPON THE COURT 25) THE WORST OF IT ALL THE JUDGES FELT SO CONFIDENT IN UNDERGROUNDS THAT THEY DID NOT BOTHER ANSWERING THE TEN FRAUDS UPON THE COURT CHARGES LVELED AGAINST THEM THST WAS A SACARILEGE NOT THST I DO NOT UNDERSTAND H EIMPOT OF THE WORD BUT THE STAE OF FLORIDA REFERS TO MAY PROPERTY AS SACRED RIGHTS THERE FORI BORROWED THEIR LINE. THAT IS PITIFUL NAD DAMNING FOR THE UNITED STATES BEFORE THE UNITED NATUIONS THIS IS MUCH BIGGER THAN THE U.S. WHY? WHY? WHY? WHUOLD JUDGES DO SUCH IS IT BECAUSE THEY TRUTED THE WHITE FUGITIVE WORDS OR BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO POTECT GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES? THE FBI WILL TELL AND ALL THE EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS WILL BE REVEALED AND BY THE THERE SHOULD NEVER NE EXPARTE COMMUNICATIONS ANYWHERE 26) SOME MORE DISCRIMINATION COUNTS UPON PURCHASING MY LAND I AM COMING HIME NOW, NATURALLY I VISITED SOME DAYS AFTER TO INWUIRE ABOUT MY PROPERTY BOUNDRES LIKE NAY REALESTATE DEVELOPER WOULD AND A WHITE WOMN APPROACHED ME TO INFOME ME THAT LAST YEAR EANING 20032 HER GARDENER CAME TO WORK AND HE WAS BLACK NAND H LOSTHER PLAE O THE ADDRESS AN WENT BEXT DOOR TO AKS THIS IS NOW FOM THE NEIGHBORHOO ND TH NEIGHBOR CALLED TH POLICE ON THE BLAACK GUY AND THST IS THE XTENT OF WHAT BLACK PEOPL DO IN THAT NEIGHBORGHOOD LET ME MAKE YOU CRY MY FOREMAN INFORMED MME IONE DAY THAT THERE VWS AN AREA WHERE SLAVERUY WAS STILL PRACTICED I SID WHAT? HE SAID MR. ROY I WILL TAKE YOU THERE ANYTIME SO ONE DAY HE REPORTED FOR WORK AN HE WAS SICJ LIKE A DOG SICK SICK AN TWO WORKERS I ORGOT THEIR NAME RUSHED TO THE FONT O THE PROPERTY TO INOM ME I QUICKLY CALLED TONYA MY NP THAT STANDS FO NURSE PRACTICIONER ME INE DAY TO REQUEST A FAVIR TH GUY HAD NO MEUCATUION WITH HIM AN H IS AFLICTED WIT THIS TRIUNE DIESEASE H HAD HIGH BLOOFD PRESSURE H HAD DIABETES AN HE HAD HEART PROBLES THE MAN WAS REALLY A WALKING DEAD MAN SO TH EMINUTE I HEARD THAT I CALLE AND TONYA A GOOD FRID AND POSSIBLE INVESTOTOR IN MY CASTLE AT THE TIME TOK ME TO PICKIT UP AT A CERATIN PAHARMACAY AND I UWICKLY RAN BACK WHERE TESH WA TO TELL HIM H TOL ME POINTBLANK SONY IF YOU WANT ME TO DIE TAKE ME THER THEY DO 'T LIKE BLACKS AND IA M A BLACK MAN SWITH BRAIDED HAIR THY WIKL NOT SERVE ME I BEGGED TH MAN AND HE THEN TOLD ME TO WATC THE POPLE TALKING TO ME AND I SAID TESH ALMOST ALL MY FRINDS ARE WHITE AND INO MAN WCAN CM AT TH KEVELOF 17MILLION DOLLARS AND DWSPISE TYOUR WHITE OUTER PART VERY BODY IS IMPORTANT TO ME I DID NOT UNDERSTND THE GAMNE AS THE LADY TOLD M AT THE AIRPORT THIS IS TOO COMPLEXE NEXT WEK I WILLCONTINUE 28) GRAND LARCENYThe 29 FORGERY 30) FELONY AND MANY COUNTS 31 ]:NO \\MALICIOUS PERSECUTION EXENMPTING THE JUDGES AND LANDING ON THE WALTON COUNTY AND THE STSTE OF FLORIDA ALONE, Malicious Prosecution, False Imprisonment and Defamation ) NO VOLUNTARY WAIVER IS A TORT OF LAW. a) The malfeasance b) the misfeasance and the c) nonfeasance are enough to put this in the million counts HERE WE GO: 3 prongs above MULTIPLIED BY 3650 or ten years @ 365 days per year IS 10,950 TIMES TEN HARASSMENT IS = 1O9,500 TIMES 62 INJURIES this is in or 67 890.000 milliomn .00 TORTS times 55 torts we have 55 torts like these from the ten harassments such will bring us to more than 400 millions tort GOD JUST SHOCKED THE WORLD AND THERE WILL BE MORE the more they obstructed God the more He brought the dirt to the surface whwn ever in amny case you have an avalanche or a plethora of torts percolating in this ,anner you know it is the hands of God alone. He did it for Moses, for Elijah who beheaded 8650 people in one day He did for Sason who tied three hndred foxes together by hnd and set them on fire turning them into bomb. Million 6,789 torts in just one tort alone and i have at least TORTS if we dare multiply these tort by the number of days i spebnt in shame then we canT counT THEM ANY MORE TIMES TEN FULL YEAR S OF SUFFEREING SOThat was involuntary waive involuntary if it is not “the product of a rational intellect and a free will.” involuntary, and therefore unreliable. (People v. 6) FORGERY. IS NOT ONLY A CRIME BUT THERE WAS NO RULE 56 and MO rule 59 and no rule 60-b to redo it the computer industry is uptodate with a redo button you can undo an redo the court Judges simply refused, crying impossibility, and said we will not let you redo we will not undo neither will we let you redo it. We have a strict policy an that too was illegal. the in PROPRIA PERSONA CLAUSE states clearly that pleading is not a game. Someone came on behalf of the judges according to runors, and said, to me it was just a game while the Supreme Court states emphatically that pleadings is not a game . Lat. 'In ones own proper person.' To represent ones self in court without assistance of an attorney, at least 'on the record.' Often shortened to 'in pro per.' The U.S. Supreme Court observed in its unanimous decision in Kay v. Ehrler, 499 U.S. 432, Ethical considerations may make it inappropriate for him to appear as a witness. He is deprived of the judgment of an independent third party in framing the theory of the case, evaluating alternative methods of presenting the evidence, cross-examining hostile witnesses FBI WORK, formulating legal arguments, and in making sure that reason, rather than emotion, dictates the proper tactical response to unforeseen developments in the courtroom. The adage that 'a lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client' is the product of years of experience by seasoned litigators.. Id. at 437-438 TO DETECT IT. I do not agree with forgery and since it was obstructed the juges tohought it was orgotten obstruction is an abiusive conduct n not a willfull one. i ou keep anyone from klnowing that ia simply abusive. i a person gives ou consent tthat becomes a voluntary waiver I o not have to go to law school for that. neither do we want suh poor ecuse before any international attorney that ae now waiting or us we shoul never let anyone coerce us into doing suh thing. NO FIR, NO FBI INVOLVEMENT i VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED ALL THESE TORTS AND NO SUMMARY JUSGM,ENYT SHOULD GO THROUGH WITH RULE 566 ON THE RECO ONCE ORE I DECLARE THAT THE JUDGMENT IS NULL AND VOID BY LAW. this is of the utmost importance since it derails good judgment and causes everyboody to land in dobts of papers presented FOR THE WALTON COUNTY attempted and committed NO HOMELAND SECURITY THAT IS ANOTHER EXTRINSIC FRAUIDS FURTHER DERAILING THE MAINSTREAM AMERICA AND THE CONSTITUTION LEADING THE WHOLE WORLD ASTRAYHERE WE GO: 3 prongs above MULTIPLIED BY 36500 or ten years @ 365 days per year IS 109,500.00 TIMES TEN HARASSMENT IS = 1,O95,000 TIMES 62 INJURIES this is inmillions the mnore they obstructed God the more he bribgs the dirt to the surface Million 6,789,000 torts in just one tort alone and i have at least 55 TORTS if we dare multiply these tort by the number of days i spebnt in shame then we canT counT THEM ANY MORE TIMES TEN FULL YEAR S OF SUFFERING 11) perjury ia a crime and no onre can pay for {+money fora crime YOU DO THE CRIME YOU SERVE THE TIME BUT JAIL TIME EXCEPT IF THERE IS A SPECIAL CONSIDERATION. a) The malfeasance b) the misfeasance and the c) nonfeasance are enough to put this in the million counts CATEGORY HERE WE GO: 3 prongs above MULTIPLIED BY 3650 or ten years @ 365 days per year IS 10,950 TIMES TEN HARASSMENT IS = 1O9,500 TIMES 62 INJURIES this is in or 67 890.000 million TORTS times 55 torts. WHEN JESUS TOLD PETER TO CAST HIS NETS INTHE DEEP HE CAUGHT SO MAY FISH THATHE ASKED HIS NEIGHBORS TO HELP HIM CARRY THE FISH IN THEIR BOAT GOD TOLD ME NOT TO BACK DOWN AND GO NDGET THE FISH ON MY WAY TO LAW SCHOOL I MUST DO WHAT MY PARENTS TOLD ME TO DO TELL THE TRUTH SND WAIT AND AOBSERVE HOW FAR TRIUTH CAN LEAD SOMEONE. FELONY CHARGES attempted and later committed FELONY CHARGES AGAINST THE WALTON COUNTY UNCHECKED BY the state of florida which committed two severe TORTS a violation of the DUTY OF CARE AND A RECKLESS NEGLIGENCE IN DELEGATING SERIOUS DUTIES UNCHECKED TO THE WALTON COUNTY we have LIKE IT 55 torts FOR EACH HARASSMENT. like these from the ten harassments such will bring us to more than 400 millions tort GOD JUST SHOCKED THE WORLD AND THERE WILL BE MORE the more they obstructed God the more He brought the dirt to the surface whwn ever in amny case you have an avalanche or a plethora of torts percolating in this ,anner you know it is the hands of God alone. He did it for Moses, for Elijah who beheaded 8650 people in one day He did for Sason who tied three hndred foxes together by hnd and set them on fire turning them into bomb. Million 6,789 torts in just one tort alone and i have at least TORTS if we dare multiply these tort by the number of days i spebnt in shame then we canT counT THEM ANY MORE TIMES TEN FULL YEAR S OF SUFFEREING SOThat was involuntary waive involuntary if it is not “the product of a rational intellect and a free will.” involuntary, and therefore unreliable. (People v. 10)FELONY _ 9) NO WARRANT TO SEARCH 10) NO SEARCH 11) NO NOTICES ACCORDING TO THE FOURTH AMENDMENT INJURY OVERSIGHT NO INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 9) NO HOMELAND SECURITY 10)NO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 9) NO WARRANT TO SEARCH 10) NO SEARCH 11) NO NOTICES ACCORDING TO THE FOURTH AMENDMENT 12) NO HUMAN RIGHTS REGARDED as stated by the United nations where Our President Appears often if the UN gets a hold of my post we are fried for the UN will not stand for our violations especially when they have to face more than 130 nations and answer to them as the ir Constituents. ​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result is 14724+ 1302= 16,026 TORTS Carried forward 13) ​NO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS​ BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT 14) ​NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS 15) ​MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE​ 16) CONTUMACIOUS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE 17 ) DISCRIMINATION DUE TO RACE, COLOR, NATIONAL ORIGIN BIAS EXISTING in the area is a major conflict of LAW, banned by the 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS and known by the Judges at the start. That judgment dated 3/31/2009, should be set aside and the case should be reopened for quick finality without further litigations. 18) MAJOR OVERSIGHT TORT 17​) ​In 2012 SCOTT BRANNON - COMPELLING VIOLATION: 18) NO JUSTICE NEITHER THE APPEARANCE OF JUSTICE 19) NO GOVERNMENT INTEREST TO WARRANT SUCH CARELESSNESS 20) NO STATE INTEREST TO BACKUP SUCH EGREGIOUS BEHAVIOR 21) RACKETEERING CHARGES 22)​MALICIOUS PROSECUTION 23) NO IMPARTIAL ARBITER 32654 TORTS Carried forward 24) I CLAIM AN ENTRY OF DEFAULT 25​) NO SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS 26) NO PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS ALSO 28) NO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAWS​. 29) ​EXTRINSIC FRAUDS:. 30) INJURY)multipliers DEPRIVATION OF MY CIVIL 31) INJURY) DEPRIVATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 32) INJURY #VI. ) ) DEPRAVATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TORTS 33) INJURY #VII) DEPRIVATION OF ESTOPPEL RIGHTS TORTS 34) nINJURY #VIII. INJURY DEPRIVATION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS TORTS 35) DEPRIVATION OF IMMUNITIES: 36) 42 USC 1983 SAYS THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE JUDHEGES ARE IMPLICAYTED RETROACTIVELY AFOR IT WAS WITHIN THEIR PURVIEW TO STOP THE CHARGES AND THEY ARROGANTLY CHOSE TO DENY SUCH. THIS IS AGAINST OUR SYSTEM 37) FELONY CHARGES attempted and later comitted FELONY CHARGES AGAINST THE WALTON COUNTY UNCHECKED BY 38) NO RULE 56 AT SUMMARY JUDGEMENT 39) OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICES 40) PRETEXTUAL INFORMATION MISLEDING INFORMATION EXTRINSIC FRAUDS 41) YEARS OF TAX RETURN UNDER FALSE PRETEXT AND THE WANTED FUGITIVE DID NOT HAVE TO SUPPLY ONE. THE PROTECTION OFFERED BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT HAS BEEN BREACHED. AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the 42) privileges or 43) immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of 44 ​life, 45) liberty, 46) property​, 47) without due process of law​;​ 48) nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. these are the attempted torts and the coomitted torts double this number as the violotiona were both attempted and committed in TORT LAWS 49) EXTRINSIC FRAUDS serious charges that invalidates an entire judgement 50) pretext a pretextual charge is frauds that vitiate a judgement like that of FRAUDS UPON THE COURT MISLEADING THE PLAINTIFF that he can ot find the truth about the case 51) forgery. this is of the utmost importance since it derails good judgment and causes everyboody to land in dobts of papers presented FOR THE WALTON COUNTY attempted and committed 52) USE FALSE PRETENSE AND PRETEXT TO OBSCURE THE TRUTH THERE WAS 53) miscarriage of justice. severe crime 54) Contumacious miscarriage of justice 55) malicious prosecution = or intentional TORTS THAT ARE CRIMES a) The malfeasance b) the misfeasance and the c) nonfeasance are enough to put this in the million counts HERE WE GO: 3 prongs above MULTIPLIED BY 36500 or ten years @ 365 days per year IS 109,500.00 TIMES TEN HARASSMENT IS = 1,O95,000 TIMES 62 INJURIES this is inmillions the mnore they obstructed God the more he bribgs the dirt to the surface Million 67,890,000 torts in just one tort alone and i have at least TORTS if we dare multiply these tort by the number of days i spebnt in shame then we canT counT THEM ANY MORE TIMES TEN FULL YEAR S OF SUFFEREING SO NO JURY TRIAL AFTER IT WAS DEMANDED BY LAW AND PROMISED BY LAW AND SCHEDULED ON FINAL ORDERS AND ABORTYED WITHOUT A NOTICE OF WAIVER THEREFORE THERE ARE TWO TORTS IN ONE 7) NO ONE THING IN AMERICA DESPITE OUR MOCKERY OF GOD ALMIGHTY HE LOVES US AND HE IS DESPERATE TO GIVE US A SECOND CHANCE BUT WE MUST REPENT SINCERELY AS HE WOOES US WITH HIS HOLY SPIRIT. AS I PROBED AMERICA AND MORE SPECIFICALLY THE STATE OF FLORIDA I REALIZED THAT WE ARE THE SAFEST NATION ON EARTH AND YET WE ARE PANICKY AND SKEPTICAL WE MUST LIFT UP OUR HEADS WITH PRIDE WE HAVE A GREAT PRESIDENT FOR THE FIRST TIME IN THE WORLD AMERICA IS PRESIDED OVER BY A BLACK MAN. we HAVE THE PREEMINENCE OF JUSTICE IN AMERICA AND THAT IS BY FAR. MEANING WE ARE A SUPERIOR NATION WITH OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM HERE IS WHAT UI COULD NOT UNDERSTAND FOLKS LISTEN IF WE ARE THE BEST AND MOST ADVANCED SHOULD WE NOT TRY TO BE MORE SYMPATHETETIC AND RESPONSIBLE BUT WE USURP EVEN THE POWER THT\THAT I NOT OUR TO HURT SOMEONE , AND FOR THAT I MENAS PEOPL IN AUTHORITY DO O A I TALKED RECEMTLY TO AN EX GNERAL OF THE ARMY THIS IS THE WORK OF PEOPLE ATTEMOTING TO GET EVEN WITH PRESIDENT OBAM OR ANYBODY AND HURTING OTHERS SINSESLY WELL, WELL, WELL. WHEN IT COMES TO JUSTICE PREEMINAENT WE ARE ALL SAFE AND THE PROTECTION WE OFFER IS FAR LESS THAN THE PROTECTION WE GIVE. THE PRESIDENT IS DOING A GREAT JOB AND WE MUST ALL FROM A BIPARTISAN STANDPOINT GIVE HIM AN APPLAUSE. INDEED WE UNDER PROMISE AND OVER DELIVER REGARDLESS OF WHAT THE CONTENDERS FOR THE PRESIDENCY ARE SAYING. GREAT INDEED IS THIS PROPHETIC COUNTRY ACCORDING TO REVELATION 13 IT LOOKS DOCILE LIKE A LAMB WHILE THE NAYSAYERS ARE RAGING IT LOOKS QUIET WHILE THE OPPOSING FORCES ARE TORMENTING THEMSELVES IT LOOKS SO WEAK AND INNOCENT WHILE THE DISSENTERS ARE TRAUMATIZING THE WORLD. BUT AT ONE POINT AMERICA WILL SPEAK LIKE A DRAGON ACCORDING TO REVELATION 13 AND THAT IS A PROPEHECY BEING FULFILLED EVEN NOW WE SPEAK AND NATIONS ARE IMMOBILIZED AMERICA, AMERICA GOD BLESS AMERICA GOD SHED HIS GRACE ON THEE. OH, SAY, CANT YOU SEE, OH BEAUTIFUL FOR PRECIOUS SKIES, gOD BLESS AMERICA. the 21 defendants of florida based on the ​wanted fugitive Charles Webb’s words, the Walton County, the State of Florida and the defendants co-conspirators of Walton County SET THEM SELVES UP IN A TRIANGLE OFFENSE AND IT WORKS AS FOLLOWS: PART 1) THE MAL FEASANCE DONE BY THE WALTON COUNTY BUT IT DOES NOT END THERE IN UNDERGROUND. THE LAWLESSNESS WENT ON TO HURT ME MORE HERE IS PART ii OF THE CAMOUFLAGE: MISFEASANCE AND THEN PRT III IS NON FEASANCE IF YOU HAVE THESE THREE PLAYING A ROLE IN ANYTHING THERE GOES YOUR CONSPIRACY CHARGES RIGHT THERE. THESE CLAIMS ARE DISPUTES I HAD FROM THE BEGINNING AND WERE OBSTRUCTED FROM COMING FORWARD.THIS COMPLAINTS WILL B PERCOLATE THE ENTIRE CYBERSPACE AND WILL REACH THE PRESIDENT FIRST BEFORE NY CONTITUEBTS AND I PRESENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS IF THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF VIEWS IT THAT WAY FOR HE TOOK AN OATH TO PROTECT THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND TO PROTECT YOU AND ME AND I WAS NOT PROTECTED AT ALL. I AM CRYNG WOLF NOT ON MY PRESIDENT BUT ON UNDERGRAOUND AMERICA THE LAWLESS ONE. WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THEY WERE LAWLESS MR. ROY DON’E YOU KNOW WHAT LAWLESS MEAN NR. ROY? I WILL ANSWER MY OWN QUESTION IN MANY WAYS. IN PROBING THE TEN MILLIONS VIOLATIONS I HAVE CURRENTLY I OBSERVED ALSO THAT NOBODY CAN FIND THAT MANY TORTS WITHOUT SOMEONE ELSE DOING SOMETHING TERRIBLY BAD. AND THAT WAS CONFIEMED AT THE DULLES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WHEN A WOMAN CAME TO ME AND TOLD ME THAT WAS SINPLY A GAME SO LET GO AND I TESTED HER I SAID DO YOU MEAN LET GO OF MY MONEY AND THE ANSWER WAS LOUD AND CLEAR YES FORGET IT THAT IS WHEN I REALIZE THE DEPTH OF IMBECILITY AND STUPIDITY THAT EXISTS IN MY CASE. PEOPLE’S MINDS WERE TOTALLY AND SCANDALOUSLY SHUT UP AND RIPPED APART AND THESE EMPTY HEADED NOMADS ALTHOUGH THEY WITNESSED MY NOSTALGIA WHICH IS NOT FUN FOR THE PAIN I ENDURED AND CONTINUE TO ENDURE BECAUSE OF MY MANEURISM THEY TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THAT TO HURT ME MORE THEY HAD NO SYMPATHY FOR ME AT ALL AND YET, THEY CLAIM TO BE FRIENDS BUT IN A NUTSHELL THEY WERE THE GREATEST FOES AND GOD SAW THEM HE WANTED ME TO KNOW WHO THEY WERE AND THE JOB WAS DONE. THE WAY THESE WOMEN TALKED ONE WOULD BE LED TO BELIEVE THAT I DID SOMETHING WRONG AND THE OTHER PEOPLE DID SOMETHING RIGHT. MY, MY, MY,. OH! LORD. ONE THING THAT THESE WOMEN NEVER PAID ATTENTION TO IN THE BIBLE IS THE HYPOTHESIS OF HYPNOSIS BY SATAN HE HYPNOTIZED SOMEONE AND BEGAN TO TAKE CONTROL OF THEIR MIND AND SOME AUTHORIIES ARE TRAINED TO DO THE SAME THING AND IF YOUARE MNOT CAREFUL THEY WILL TURN YOUR DAY INTO NIGHT AND YOUR DREAMS WILL BECOME NIGHTMARES ONE BODY GURD FRIOEND OF MINE DID THE SAME THING TO ME NOW FRIENDS AND I WROTE EXTINSIVELY ABOUT FRIENDSHIPS, JESUS IS THE FRIEND THAT STICKS CLOSER THAN A BROTHER A FRIED IS BORN FOR SDVERSITY MAKE NO MISTAKES ABOUT IT. A FRIEN THEY EVE WENT ON CONVERSING WITH THE DEVIL THE DEVIL WILL MWKE YOU THINK THT GOD IS WRONG AND HE IS RIOGHT WHAT DO YOU XPECT FROM DEMONS TO LOVE YOU TO CARE FOR YOU TO EXALTYOUR DREAM TO PLEASE YOU NO, VERILY NO. THE PURPOSE OF DEVILS IS TO DISCOURAGE YOU AND THAT WAS TAUGHT ME EARLY INLIFE THESE PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW HOW PRE[PARED I WAS. THEY ARE KICKING AGIST THE PRICKS AND I AM WRITING THIS PIECE RIGHT HERE FORM, I TELL THE TRUTH AND TO MY DEATH NO ONE CAN TAKE THAT FRON ME THE MOTION IS DIVIDED IN TEN PARTS and WILL NECESSITATE A QUALIFIED JUDGE TO end with the DEMANDS OF FINALITY. NO more DOCTRINE OF ATTRITION which makes me sick and tired. THE PURPOSE OF THIS MOTION; A.IS TO CONTINUE TO SEEK FINALITY B. TO DECLARE MY FINDING OF MORE THAN 1) TEN MILLIONS TORTS AFTER 2) TEN YEARS AND 3) TEN HARASSMENTS AND 4) TEN FRAUDS UPON THE COURT IN THE WHOLE CASE PENDING REVIEW BY QUALIFIED AUTHORITIES UNDER OATH AS I FOUND THEM AND MAKING ITS DIFFICULT WAY TO THE UNITED NATIONS AS WE SPEAK FOR THIS IS WAY TOO MUCH FOR OUR BUSY PRESIDENT WITH ALL THE DEMANDS FROM THE NAYSAYERS ACTING UP I UNDERSTAND HIS BUSINESS. I RESPECT THAT. C. TO ONCE MORE OR FOR THE FOURTH TIME REQUEST A COPY OF MY FILE AS I REQUESTED VEHEMENTLY BEFORE D.TO PURSUE FUNDINGS FOR MY TWELVE HOSPITALIZATIONS BILLS THAT ARE STAGGERING AT THIS TIME AND OTHER MAJOR INJURIES I SUFFERED TO STAY ALIVE BE IT DENTAL PHYSICAL MORAL AND DEPRIVATIONS E.TO BLOW THE WHISTLE AS I INTEND TO DO ON VIOLATIONS OF THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT F.TO BLOW THE WHISTLE ON DEFIANCE AGAINST RULE 56 BY THE FEDERAL JUDGES FOR NOT USING THE RULE AT ALL WHILE EXECUTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT :My Goal was a a.To buy a piece of property of $1.3 million dollars and i did b.TO obtain a development order like Mr. trump does always and I did c.To develop my land not obstructed by anyone else and I did d.to build the first CASTLE CITY DEVELOPMENT UNDER CHATEAUX DE PARIS and I did e. I have Realized A HEALTHY PROFIT of 600% in a short seven months RECORD BREAKING The Walton County placed its ears to the ground the commissioners would hear the hoofbeats of approaching horsemen or the Apocalypse of money-making on the Gulf of Mexico. g.To Fulfill God’s requirements for my life and I did 1.OCTOBER 2004 First SWO based on the FUGITIVE noncredible complaint 2.May 11, 2005 2nd SWO based on the FUGITIVE noncredible complaint 3.May 12, 2005 belated Written complaint by Ken Goldberg based on the FUGITIVE noncredible complaint 4.July 15, 2005 Extortion Charges, based on the FUGITIVE noncredible complaint 5.July 15, 2005 third SWO, based on the FUGITIVE noncredible complaint This is the jostling for supremacy of two Americas. Which one will take the lead depends on many factors but for one thing I am sure Nothing takes the led unless the Commander in Chief says so. Republicans can be agitated but the FBI plays no game and the systemic agencies of the AMERICA THAT LASTS demands justivce your OATH OF OFFICE guarantees protection of the United States Constitution, even when partisan annoyances emerge. Mr. President Finish Strong Through the Storm wa my manuscript waiting for my fuds to be published i was hospitalized twelve times in ten years and those saaggering bills must be paid aalong with all tests io was deprived of all muy funds by the walton county and i hve found after ten years two Americas the good one that you preside over and an underground America where people do as they please I demand an account to make sure i am living as you said in the AMERICA THAT LASTS AUTHORITATIVE CITATION:Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States." the 1964 civil rights act Title six is my talking point here and i will not bulge from there until the president realizes what is happening here i am hurt and I lost more than fifteen million dollars on u.s. soil due to what was said and many other things here . Per your action some years ago giving greater protection to WHISTLE BLOWERS, I am issuing to the United States Congress the same for your words were broken and the level of obstruction is high by this great conspiracy extraordinaire. by the Federal judges who told me the following on line:”the Roys own property in an area that HISTIORICALLY has been RACIALLY SEGREGATED (I called this (HRS)a sign should be placed in northern florida for all investors to beware of that area for this is (and I borrowed that word) this is PERNICIOUS. No human being in their right mind should go to Florida while the Condition have not met the standards of the AMERICA THAT LASTS in my view. all the people cooperating with the underground must meet the fate of underground that means the sanctuary of justice must take the appropriate actions and the number is staggering for i understand that according to rumors there are more than one thousand people involved with their cell phones and taking pictures I do not know if this is true for I have not been part of that world but very clearly the underground departed from Mainstream America to follow a different path and i am calling wolf before its too late. And they all are republicans that did this to my knowledge. the whole nation can get hurt as the high court took discretion and the district court judges are disqualified lost jurisdiction and issued order under a loss of jurisdiction that is grave for america unless you step in and regulate what has happened here. let us take the first issue, the 1964 civil rights act is the act theat the late Ronald reagan Stated on the world wide web that he would defend it at gu point and i believe you would too to my understanding it has been disparaged here by the non-marginal statement of two Federal judges as follows: AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: 1) ”Pleadings in this case are being filed by Plaintiff In Propria Persona, wherein pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicalities. Propria, pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as practicing lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner 92 S Ct 594, also See Power 914 F2d 1459 (11th Cir 1990), also See Hulsey v. Ownes 63 F3d 354 (5th Cir 1995). also See In Re: HALL v. BELLMON 935 F.2d 1106 (10th Cir. 1991)."#2) AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: In Puckett v. Cox, it was held that a pro-se pleading requires less stringent reading than one drafted by a lawyer (456 F2d 233 (1972 Sixth Circuit USCA). Justice Black in Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 at 48 (1957) "The Federal Rules rejects the approach that “pleading is a game of skill in which one misstep by counsel may be decisive to the outcome and accept the principle that the purpose of pleading is to facilitate a proper decision on the merits." According to Rule 8(f) FRCP and the State Court rule which holds that all pleadings shall be construed to do substantial justice." HERE is the list of salient pointS or torts as i promised : NOCREDIBILITY FROM A WANTED FUGITIVE. MY, MY ND MY AND I LOT MORE THAN FIOIFTEEN KMILLIONS DOLLARS This Complaint is divided into three counts for each TORT as I found during my ten years of great probe. count 1) MALFEASANCE< count 2) MISFEASANCE AND count 3) NONFEASABNNCE post. these will further be extrapolated by multiplying the number of days by the torts at hand and below I have exposed atleast 30 salient TORTS OF LAW IRREFUTABLE BY THE STANDARDS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, as new counts. It simply means Mr. president that each day that passes by America and more specifically the defendants of the South are incurring a greater and greater bill that is getting to be astronomical I had ten years in hios and i was obstructed from talking after i found extrinsic frauds at the start the presence of a wanted fugitive along is fraulent and the walton county to obstruct further never contacted the FBI OFFICE which made the whole matter more terryfying the systemic fbi was not called and an investigation a major investigation is going on. This is the plain nature of the civil side and the case becomes more acute from the criminal sides. unless your inherent powers intervene to veto this there will be a lot of problem s due to my injuries and I ite here the most salient points a. I lost over 15 millions dollars in appraised properties and some of the appraisers were deposed and they gave theyir reasons for appraising whatthey did. b.I lost affection with my wife of thirty five years and that was directly diue to the words of George R,. Mead to my wife and to her face stating after he plainly ws not prepared for the oral argument for he cared less that was not him you see. One law firm i contacted in Florida told me point blank they would start with my lawyer and cut him to shreds in court first. it should be noted that the chief judge went to defend my attorney nd the conivence mkes it the most appearent what was going on and how my foerafathers and ancesters died without knowing what hit them. The chief judge stated on one of her orders that should have been disqualified to my reccolection in the year 2011, also My lawyer stated did nothing wrong on the oder issued to me after i denounced the conflict of interest a PLEASE, DO NOT PAY ATTENTION TO THE TIME THERE ARE a) extrinsic frauds and frauds upon the court that trump all time for there are no statutes of limitation for FRAUDS. THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS BEYOND THE CONFESSED OVERSIGHT AT THE GET GO WAS FULL OF THEM. THEN, WE HAVE THE ALLEGED AND ASSERTED VIOLATIONS WHICH WERE LEFT IN DEFIANCE TO THE CONSTITUTION WITHOUT AS “FAILURE TO ANSWER” THE CHIEF JUDGE IS WELL AWARE OF THOSE rules and the danger of not answering a claim specially FRAUDS UPON THE COURT FOR THEY ARE TIMELESS AND CANNOT BE TRUMPED BY ANY STATUTEs OF LIMITATION. IT IS TIME TO TOWER with such a PREEMINENCE OF JUSTICE NOT COWER AS THOSE WHO HAVE NO LaWS AND NO CONSTITUTION. AMERICA LOOKS GREaT and SHARP WHEN ITS PEOPLE MAINTAIN the law, IT IS TIME TO GO FORWARD NOT TO BE STUCK. I AM NOT CALLING FOR ANY CORRECTIONS OR THE ANNER THE CORRECTIONS SHOULD TAKE EFFECT, NOT THIS IS THE JOB OF THE HIGH NOBLES. The presumption of innocence, sometimes referred to by the Latin expression Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat (the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies), is the principle that one is considered innocent unless proven guilty. In many nations, presumption of innocence is a legal right of the accused in a criminal trial, and it is also regarded as an international human right under the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 11. The burden of proof is thus on the prosecution, which has to collect and present enough compelling evidence to convince the trier of fact, who is restrained and ordered by law to consider only actual evidence and testimony that is legally admissible, and in most cases lawfully obtained, that the accused is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. If reasonable doubt remains, the accused is to be acquitted. Under Justinian Codes and English Common law, the accused is presumed innocent in criminal proceedings, and in civil proceedings (like breach of contract) both sides must issue proof. Under Anglo-American Common Law, the accused is always presumed innocent in all types of proceedings; proof is always the burden of the accuser. Under Islamic Law, a tradition had not been solidified but doubtful evidence should be rejected upon moral principles. i WILL NOT OVER LAY TEN MILLIONS TORTS HERE THAT WOULD BE BY ITSELF DEFAMING FOR THE SANCTUARY OF JUSTICE AND TO ALL. I LIMIT MY EXPOSE HERE TO THE MOST SALIENT, CRIMINAL OR/AND THE MOST RECURRING TORTS THE OVERAMPLIFIED VERSION WITH THE TEN MILLIONS TORTS IS RESERVED TO THOSE WHO CAN UNDERSTAND THE POWER OF COMPOUNDING LEST WE LOSE OUR HEADS IN EXTRAPOLATION AND QUANTUM DEVELOPMENTS. HERE ARE THE VIOLATIONS IN THE 1ST HARASSMENT DEPRIVED OF THE FOLLOWING. 2) TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 249 Hate Crimes Prevention Act AGINST RACE, COLOR, NATIONAL ORIGIN This statute makes it unlawful to willfully cause bodily injury—or attempting to do so with fire, firearm, or other dangerous weapon—when 1) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin of any person, or 2) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person and the crime affected interstate or foreign commerce or occurred within federal special maritime and territorial jurisdiction. The law also provides funding and technical assistance to state, local, and tribal jurisdictions to help them to more effectively investigate, prosecute, and prevent hate crimes. The law provides for a maximum 10–year prison term, unless death (or attempts to kill) results from the offense, or unless the offense includes kidnapping or attempted kidnapping, or aggravated sexual abuse or attempted aggravated sexual abuse. For offenses not resulting in death, there is a seven–year statute of limitations. For offenses resulting in death, there is no statute of limitations. I am CHARGING THE WALTON COUNTY FOR THREE COUNTS OF VIOLATION AGAINT ME IN THIS CASE TAKING 19 DEFENDANTS COMMITTING THAT ACT CAUSED ME TO LOSE MY WIFE OF 35 YEARS AND MY WELATH OF MORE THAN 15, MIIdollars on the Gulf oF MexIco AND ALL MY RIGHTS AS A UNITED STATES CITIZEN> THE TWO JUDGES WILL BE INCLUDED IF THEY STUBBORNLY REFUSE TO ADHERE WITH CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.21 DEfEndants by 62 injuries times thr “pleading is NOT A game of skill in which one misstep by counsel may be decisive to the outcome” WHY DO I ENOHASIZE THIS. RECENTLY I HEARD THE SAME FOR THESE PEOPLE WERE BENT ON ME LOOSING MY CASE TO COLLECT FROM SOMEBODY. 1.NO CREDIBILITY IOS A FRAULENT CASE ALL THE WAY THAT IS AN EXTRINSIC FRAUIDS CHARACTERIZING THE ENTIRE CASE AS FRAUDS AND THAT STARTED IN 2005 TO MY RECOLLECTION THEREFORE I DECRETE THIS CASE FRAUDS EXTRINSIC FRAUDS AND NO NEED FOR UNDERGROUND TO DPOME WITH ANY NEW RULINGS THE CASE IS FRAUD. WE VENTURE TO SAY AND FOR GOOD CAUSE “Sticks and stones can break my bones but words cannot hurt me” and we applaud preachers on the pulpit when they come up with wise sayings but, in my case it did not work at all. i wish the sticks and the stones would break my bones but it was the words of a Wanted AND UNINVESTIGATED Fugitive that hurt more than the words of a wise person and my father was a wise man who in six short years taught me everything I needed to know about life almost except what i contributed TO it myself. This is a A MULTIPLIER AND A recurring tort for the entire PROCESS 13) ​NO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS​ BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT THE SHORT LIST OF ALL SALIENT TORTS PERTAINING TO ALL HARASSMENT AND THE FRAUDS UPON THE COURT ALLEGED AGAINST THE FEDERAL JUDGES AND LEFT UNANSWERED SINCE 2011 FROM THE HARASSMENT CHARGES THAT HAPPENED ON OCTOBER 2004 TO THE IMPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL JUDGES RETROACTIVELY. THE CHIEF FEDERAL JUDGE WAS WITHIN HER PURVIEW TO STOP THE CHARGES AND THEY ARROGANTLY CHOSE TO DENY AVERYTHING AND ENTERED SUMNMARY JUDGEMENT WITHOUT RULE 56 ND REFUSED TO REOPEN WITH RULE 60BBEING FROM THE SOUTH TO MY UNDERSTANDING. IF THE SANCTUARY OF JUSTICE REFUSED TO DISCIPLINE AND CORRECT THE WRONG DONE TO OUR IMAGE AS A COUNTRY HERE, MAY BE THE UNITED NATIONS WILL BE BETTER SUITED FOR THAT TASK. SUCH. THIS IS AGAINST OUR SYSTEM IN AMERICA. HERE ARE THE SALIENT VIOLATIONS IN ALL THE HARASSMENTS WITHOUT THE FOLLOWING: 1.NO CREDIBILITY WE VENTURE TO SAY AND FOR GOOD CAUSE WHAT CREDIBILITY EXISTS IN THE WORDS OF A WANTED AND UNINVESTIGATED FUGITIVE WITHOUT THE PARTICIPATION OF THE FBI, THE DA OFFICE, THE HUD THE DOJ THE FCC, THE HOMELAND SECURITY, THE WHOLR GINJNIT OF INVESTIGATIVE EXPERTS WAS MISSED FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF ABSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE THSI IS CRAZY WHILE I LOOSE MORE THAN FIFTEEN MIILION AND I LOST AFFECTION WITH MY WIFE OF 35 YEARS AND I LOST ALL NY RIGHTS INCLUDING MY HUMAN RIGHTS AND MY FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND THE JUDGES SINPLY ARE WAITING FOR THE NEXT PREYS IN AMERICA THA DOE NOT MAKE ANY SENSE UNDER GOD’S HEAVEN. iT IS VER HARD FOR ANY BLACK MAN TO SUCCEED IN AMERICA EVEN THE THE AMERICA THAT LASTS LET ALONE THE UNDERGROUND AND THE LAWLESS AMERICA AND SOME IS TELLING ME TO ACCEPT SUCH IN THE MAERICA THAT ;ASTS. THAT IS UNDERGROUND STUFF AND I DETEST THAT IT CAUSED MY TOTAL DEMNISE AND THE CAMOUGFLGE I AHAVE BEEN HEARING IS EVEN GROSSER HERE IS ONE AND IF THOSE PEOPLE DO NOT STOP I ATTEMPTING TO SABOTAGE THE LEGAL LIVELIHOOD OF AN AMERICAN CITISZEN THAT HURTS I WAS TERRIBLY HURT BY THAT. THAT WAS NOT CALLED FOR IF YOU ARE AT THE WALTON COUNTY GOD IS NOT PLEASED AT ALL “Sticks and stones can break my bones but words cannot hurt me” and we applaud preachers on the pulpit when they come up with wise sayings but, in my case it did not work at all. i wish the sticks and the stones would break my bones but it was the words of a Wanted Fugitive that hurt more than the words of a wise person and my father was a wise man who in six short years taught me everything I needed to know about life almost except what i contributed in it my self. This is a A MULTIPLIER AND A recurring tort for the entire PROCESS 6) NO PROBABLE CAUSE: obstruction of justice all the way. Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant. Courts usually find probable cause when there is a reasonablebasis for believing that a crime may have been committed (for an arrest) or when evidence of the crime is present in the place to be searched (for a search). Under exigent circumstances, probable cause can also justify a warrantless search or seizure. Persons arrested without a warrant are required to be brought before a competent authority shortly after the arrest for a prompt judicial determination of probable cause. 7) NO FBI INVOLVED : THE GREATEST AGENCY TO INVESTIGATE A MATTER IN THE AMERICAN SYSTEM WAS AVAILABLE AND SKIPPED. that was the fbi that was tghe time to show the world what our agencies coulds do. THE FBI WAS NOT CONTACTED AT ALL. 8) obstruction of justice the plaintiff had no recourse while loosing more than fifteen million dollars on us. Soil. Not the same as no justice I may skippe Justce anbnd I may obstruxt Justice and that are not the same things. 9) NO HOMELAND SECURITY 10)NO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 9) NO WARRANT TO SEARCH 10) NO SEARCH 11) NO NOTICES ACCORDING TO THE FOURTH AMENDMENT INJURY OVERSIGHT NO INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 9) NO HOMELAND SECURITY 10)NO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 9) NO WARRANT TO SEARCH 10) NO SEARCH 11) NO NOTICES ACCORDING TO THE FOURTH AMENDMENT 12) NO HUMAN RIGHTS REGARDED as stated by the United nations where Our President Appears often if the UN gets a hold of my post we are fried for the UN will not stand for our violations especially when they have to face more than 130 nations and answer to them as the ir Constituents. ​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result is 14724+ 1302= 16,026 TORTS Carried forward 13) ​NO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS​ BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT 14) ​NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS 15) ​MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE​ 16) CONTUMACIOUS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE 17 ) DISCRIMINATION DUE TO RACE, COLOR, NATIONAL ORIGIN BIAS EXISTING in the area is a major conflict of LAW, banned by the 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS and known by the Judges at the start. That judgment dated 3/31/2009, should be set aside and the case should be reopened for quick finality without further litigations. 18) MAJOR OVERSIGHT TORT 17​) ​In 2012 SCOTT BRANNON - COMPELLING VIOLATION: 18) NO JUSTICE NEITHER THE APPEARANCE OF JUSTICE 19) NO GOVERNMENT INTEREST TO WARRANT SUCH CARELESSNESS 20) NO STATE INTEREST TO BACKUP SUCH EGREGIOUS BEHAVIOR 21) RACKETEERING CHARGES 22)​MALICIOUS PROSECUTION 23) NO IMPARTIAL ARBITER 32654 TORTS Carried forward 24) I CLAIM AN ENTRY OF DEFAULT 25​) NO SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS 26) NO PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS ALSO 28) NO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAWS​. 29) ​EXTRINSIC FRAUDS:. 30) INJURY)multipliers DEPRIVATION OF MY CIVIL 31) INJURY) DEPRIVATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 32) INJURY #VI. ) ) DEPRAVATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TORTS 33) INJURY #VII) DEPRIVATION OF ESTOPPEL RIGHTS TORTS 34) nINJURY #VIII. INJURY DEPRIVATION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS TORTS 35) DEPRIVATION OF IMMUNITIES: 36) 42 USC 1983 SAYS THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE JUDHEGES ARE IMPLICAYTED RETROACTIVELY AFOR IT WAS WITHIN THEIR PURVIEW TO STOP THE CHARGES AND THEY ARROGANTLY CHOSE TO DENY SUCH. THIS IS AGAINST OUR SYSTEM 37) FELONY CHARGES attempted and later comitted FELONY CHARGES AGAINST THE WALTON COUNTY UNCHECKED BY 38) NO RULE 56 AT SUMMARY JUDGEMENT 39) OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICES 40) PRETEXTUAL INFORMATION MISLEDING INFORMATION EXTRINSIC FRAUDS 41) YEARS OF TAX RETURN UNDER FALSE PRETEXT AND THE WANTED FUGITIVE DID NOT HAVE TO SUPPLY ONE. THE PROTECTION OFFERED BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT HAS BEEN BREACHED. AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the 42) privileges or 43) immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of 44 ​life, 45) liberty, 46) property​, 47) without due process of law​;​ 48) nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. these are the attempted torts and the coomitted torts double this number as the violotiona were both attempted and committed in TORT LAWS 49) EXTRINSIC FRAUDS serious charges that invalidates an entire judgement 50) pretext a pretextual charge is frauds that vitiate a judgement like that of FRAUDS UPON THE COURT MISLEADING THE PLAINTIFF that he can ot find the truth about the case 51) forgery. this is of the utmost importance since it derails good judgment and causes everyboody to land in dobts of papers presented FOR THE WALTON COUNTY attempted and committed 52) USE FALSE PRETENSE AND PRETEXT TO OBSCURE THE TRUTH THERE WAS 53) miscarriage of justice. severe crime 54) Contumacious miscarriage of justice 55) malicious prosecution = or intentional TORTS THAT ARE CRIMES 48 torts times 48 torts Plus 48 is 96 96 torts times obstruction as a multiplier is 96 more 0r 192 192 torts times extrinsinc frauds is 192 torts times 2 or 384 torts 384 torts times pretextual torts is the number multiplied by two or 768 torts 768 torts times forgery two is the quantity above times two or 1526 TORTS 1526 torts times false pretense and misleading lies 3052 3052 times miscarriage of justice two miscarriage of justice is 6104 torts 6104 times two for contumacious miscarraiage of justice or 12, 208. 12208 times the injuries which are 62 = 12208x 62= 756 896 so far now we have ten harassments and the others have more charges 6) NO PROBABLE CAUSE: obstruction of justice all the way. 7) NO FBI INVOLVED : THE GREATEST AGENCY TO INVESTIGATE A MATTER IN THE AMERICAN SYSTEM WAS AVAILABLE AND SKIPPED. 8) obstruction of justice the plaintiff had no recourse while loosing more than fifteen million dollars on us. Soil. Not the same as no justice I may skippe Justce anbnd I may obstruxt Justice and that are not the same things. 756896 x 10 is 7, mill ion 568 thousand plus we have the ten frauds upon the court Coming Up. And all the other torts of attempted and committed such as the attempted muder by all the defendants these torts were committed and attempted by the entire conspiracy and i believe when it all said and done we may have 12 or thirteen millions I will continue this harduous work for torts are like products in the store and when they can be validated they carry their own values. NEVER A DO VIOLATED ON MAY 12 2005 WITH THE FOLLOWING # 41190 - 400090 SUCH DO DOENS NOT EXIST FOR THE DO RETIRED ON MAY 5, 2005 HOW COULD IT REAPPEAR ON MAY 12 BY KEN GOLDBERG AN UNINSURED ATTORNEY WHO LIED UNDER OATH ALSO AFTER REGISTERING THE CABAL AND SEALING A DEAL WITH MY THEN ATTORNEY THE DEAL FAILED THROUGH AND MY ATTORNEY WAS FIRED BY ME AND I WAS FURIOUS AS AI DO NOT WANT TO SEE HIM AT ALL HE STOLE MY CONFIDENCE AND ALL THE THINGS I DISCUSSED WHIM I UNDERSTAND BECAME PUBLIC INFORMATION.. THIS IS A LEGAL RIP OFF AND I DO NOT WANT ANY PART IN A RIP OFF THE STATE IF WHAT THE FEDERAL JUDGES SAID IS CORRECT MUST CLEAN ITSELF AND i WAS IN TOUCH WITH THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE DEMANDING THE SAME i DO NOT KNOW WHAT HAS BEEN DONE BUT I BLEW THE WHISTLE AND IMMEDIATELY SOMEONE ANSWERED AND STOPPED. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS CLEANED AND OUR SYSTEM IS SIGHT WE THE PREEMINENCE BUT LIKE DR. DEMING STATED SOMEONE IS ATTEMPTING TO PENETRATE 15% WITH 85% DISORDERS AND SUCH AS I LEARNED IN SCHOOL DOES NOT WORK. THE PEOPLE THAT ORCHESTRATE THE LEADERSHIP MUST TAKE CHARGE AND PRESENT A NEW SANCTUARY OF JUSTICE CLEANSED TOO MUCH DEFILEMENTS WENT THOU TOO MANY VIOLATIONS WENT IN TOO MANY TRANSGRESSION AND WE NEED TO DO IT RIGHT AWAY FOR THESE NAYSAYERS ARE WAITING FOR LOOPHOLES TO CONTINUE THEIR SENSELESS 4) NO REMORSE: ​this is a multipLier for to this day no one has called me or emailed me to say they’RE SORRY AND SOME ARE TRYING TO HURT ME MORE BY PLACING MY NAME ON A LIST TO DEFAME ME AND DEFAMATION IS A RECURRING VIOLATIONS AND A CRIME ALSO. REMORSELESSLY AND RECKLESSLY AND NO ONE STEPPED FORWARD TO APOLOGIZE TO ME DESPITE THE BLATANT FACTS. NOT EVEN A LETTER OF EXCUSE WAS ISSUED TO EXPRESS THE SORROW AND THE PAINS INFLICTED THAT WAS TERRIBLE. ​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result is 3,906 + 1302 carried forward so far 5,208 Torts of law with offer of proof 5) NO INVESTIGATION AT ALL A MULTIPLIER AND A RECURRING TORT. tHROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE PROCEEDING MY CASE HAS BEEN BUTCHERED AS THOUGH gOD’S HANDS VEERED THE HANDS OF MAN AND THEIR MINDS NOT TO SEE THAT THEY WERE HURTING ME. fORGIVENESS DOES NOT EXEMPT THE CRUCIFIX OF THE OFFENSE. (MAJOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE TO PROTECT THE WANTED FUGITIVE) ​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result i 1302 + 5208 = 6,510 TORTS carried forward so far ​Read more: ​http://fullformdirectory.in/fir.html#ixzz3oegvHPTY . i AM SO GLAD THAT GOD DOES NOT CHANGE. 6) NO PROBABLE CAUSE: THIS IS A MULTIPLIER AND A RECURRING TORT hOW CAN WE DO ANY THING IN THE US WITHOUT THAT THE FIRST THING WE MuST SEEK IS TO HAVE PROBABLE CAUSE ESPEVCCIALLY WHEN SO MUH MONEY WAS INVOLVED. AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: THIS IS NOT A GAME. ​The ​Fourth Amendment of the ​U.S. Constitution provides, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against ​unreasonable searches and seizures​, shall not be violated, and no ​Warrants shall issue, but upon ​probable cause​, supported by ​Oath or affirmation,(ADDED NOTICE) ​LADIES AND GENTLEMEN IF THERE IS NO WARRANT ISSUED THERE CANNOT BE ANY SEARCH DONE FOR IT OS THE WARRANT THAT ​TELLS SOMEONE WHAT AND WHERE TO SEARCH and particularly describing the place to be ​searched​, and the persons or things to be ​seized​." THE WALTON COUNTY DOES NOT EVEN HAVE A SCINTILLA OF EVIDENCE OF WHAT THE COMMISSIONERS ACCUSED ME OF. THEY TURNED ME AROUND AND MADE ME GUILTY BY MASQUERADING THE CASE AND USING PRETEXTUAL TACTICS AND THE DOCTRINE OF ATTRITION. THEY OBSTRUCTED THE JUICE IN JUSTICE AND HAVE DONE THE WORST THING IN HISTORY NEVER BEFORE DID ANY COUNTY DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THAT IS WHY GOD TOLD ME TO LET THEM CONTINUE TO ENTANGLE THEMSELVES. FRANKLY I DO NOT KNOW WHY FEDERAL JUDGES GOT INVOLVED IN SUCH A MESS. WITH MOITRE THAN TEN MILLION VIOLATION ALL I CAN SAY IS ​“TO GOD BE THE GLORY (MAJOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE TO PROTECT THE WANTED FUGITIVE) ​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result i 6,510.00 + 1302 or = 7,812 TORTS Carried forward so far Read more:​ ​http://fullformdirectory.in/fir.html#ixzz3oegvHPTY 7) NO FBI INVOLVED THIS IS SERIOUS. ANOTHER MULTIPLIER AND A RECURRING TORT. FOR THE U.S. GOVERNMENT INCORPORATED THE fbi AS PART OF THE SYSTEM TO INVESTIGATE ALL THINGS AND IT WAS AVAILABLE BUT NOT USED (THE FBI WAS AVAILABLE TO THE COUNTY AND THE JUDGES AND THE STATE OF FLORIDA BUT WAS NEVER CONTACTED)​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result 7812 TORTS + 1302 9114.00 TORTS Carried forward so far 8) NO HOMELAND SECURITY MY CASE WA LOST IN AMERICA. ANOTHER AGENCY UNSUSED AND ABVAILABLE TO ALL. they weRE never EVEN CONTACTED FURTHER OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE)​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result i 9,114. + 1302 = 10,416.00 TORTS Carried forward so far 8) NO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WE ARE DEALING WITH THE 1964 cIVIL rIGHTS aCT AND THE doj IS NOT CONTACTED ? NOT EVEN INVOLVED For an investigation in the charges against me or WHILE THE 1964 cIVIL RIGHTS WAS INVOLVED the DOJ was available but was never contacted that is systemic and holding WE HAVE BUILT THESE AGENCIES AS PART POF OUR SSYSTEM TO DEFEND AMERICA AGAINST IMNTRUDERS THEREFORE MY NAME SHOULD COME UP FOR INVESTIGATION AND SOME ONE WOULD HAVE SAID HOLD IT THIS MAN IS A MINISTER OF THE GOSPEL. BUT, NONE OF THAT. 21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result is 2604+ 1302 + Carried forward = 10,416.00 + 1302 = 11718 TORTS carriefd forwrad so far 9) NO WARRANT TO SEARCH AUTHORITTATIVE CITATION: ​The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the people's right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, which often -- but not always -- means that government agents must have a warrant to search and seize your person and property. Here is the full text of the Fourth Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by ​Oath or affirmatio​n, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. The Fourth Amendment protects the people from ​unreasonable searches and seizures, which means that many searches are fine as long as they meet certain requirements. Searches are generally considered reasonable when: 1) a judge issues a search warrant based on probable cause; or 2) certain situations occur that justify a search without a warrant (a search for weapons after an arrest, for example). - See more at: http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-rights/search-warrant-requirements.html#sthash.sqPyEVO3.dpuf 21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result is 11718 + 1302 = 12020 TORTS Carried forward 10) NO SEARCH (a) if there were no warrant how can there be a search? it is the court warrant that tells what to search or what to seize or what to condemn. without the Warrant from an ​Impartial Arbiter such as Our Court System there cannot be a search (b) the two dispatched workers from the county members of this cabal stated during deposition that they premeditated what to do on their way to my location. they never searched. as they did not need to. ​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result is 12020.00 + 1302 = 13322 TORTS Carried forward 11) NO NOTICES or not ​supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. - See more at: http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-rights/search-warrant-requirements.html#sthash.sqPyEVO3.dpuf​the fourth amendment states that a notice should be issued to the person accused they did the reverse and eliminated the required process to do their own thing with issue of proof at the District Court. ​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result is 13322.00 + 1302 = 14724 TORTS Carried forward facebook.com No. 9 The Rights of No. 10 The Rights of the Child No. 12 The Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination NoNo. 11 Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions (Rev.1) (Rev.1) Forms of Slavery injuries VIOLATION OF THE 13th AMENDMENT No. 14 Contemporary No. 15 Civil and Political Rights: 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT No. 16 The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Rev.1) No. 17 The Committee against Torture No. 18 Minority No 19 National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights Rights (Rev.1) No. 20 Human Rights and Refugees The Human Rights Committee (Rev.1)No. 13 International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights No. 21 The Right to Adequate Housing (Rev.1) No. 22 Discrimination against Women: The Convention and the Committee No. 23 Harmful Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children No. 24 The International Convention on Migrant Workers and its Committee (Rev.1) No. 27 Seventeen Frequently Asked Questions about United Nations Special RapporteurNo. 30 The United Nations Human Rights Treaty System (Rev.1) No. 28 The Impact of Mercenary Activities on the Right of Peoples to Self- determination s No. 29 Human Rights Defenders: Protecting the Right to Defend Human Rights No. 35 The Right to Water No. 34 The Right to Adequate Food No. 33 Frequently Asked Questions on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights No. 32 Human Rights, Terrorism and Counter-terrorism No. 31 The Right to Health ) Indigenous Peoples (Rev.1) Human Rights Treaties (Rev.2) Disappearances (Rev.3) No. 4 Combating Torture (Rev.1) No. 3 Advisory Services and Technical Cooperation in the Field of Human Rights (Rev.1) No. 2 The International Bill of Human Rights (Rev.1) 1 * Fact sheets Nos. 1, 5 and 8 are no longer issued. All fact sheets are available online from www.ohchr.org. 46 The Human Rights Fact Sheet series is published by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, United Nations Office at Geneva. It deals with selected questions of human rights that are under active consideration or are of particular interest. Human Rights Fact Sheets are intended to assist an ever-wider audience in better understanding basic human rights, what the United Nations is doing to promote and protect them, and the international machinery available to help realize those rights. Human Rights Fact Sheets are free of charge and distributed worldwide. Tort of law the days must be counted 3650 days bring us to mAY 11 2015 we must calculate from May 11, 2015 to Niovember 3 2015 7 months a 30 days is 210 days o counts. on top of the 3650 days or 3, 860.00 days times 55 torts Pro Se litigants – In Propria Persona Non-Lawyer pro se litigants not to be held to same standards as a practicing lawyer Many pro se litigants will use this in their pleadings; “Pleadings in this case are being filed by Plaintiff In Propria Persona, wherein pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicalities. Propria, pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as practicing lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner 92 Sct 594, also See Power 914 F2d 1459 (11th Cir1990), also See Hulsey v. Ownes 63 F3d 354 (5th Cir 1995). also See In Re: HALL v. BELLMON 935 F.2d 1106 (10th Cir. 1991).” In Puckett v. Cox, it was held that a pro-se pleading requires less stringent reading than one drafted by a lawyer (456 F2d 233 (1972 Sixth Circuit USCA). Justice Black in Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 at 48 (1957) “The Federal Rules rejects the approach that pleading is a game of skill in which one misstep by counsel may be decisive to the outcome and accept the principle that the purpose of pleading is to facilitate a proper decision on the merits.” According to Rule 8(f) FRCP and the State Court rule which holds that all pleadings shall be construed to do substantial justice.” there was no justice nor the appearance of justice and the one sent to harass ne at the airport stated that it was a game the JUDGES WERE PLAYING. a) The malfeasance b) the misfeasance and the c) nonfeasance are enough to put this in the million counts HERE WE GO: 3 prongs above MULTIPLIED BY 3,860 or ten years plus 210 days @ 365 days per year IS 11, 580.00 TIMES TEN HARASSMENTs IS = 115.800.00 TIMES 62 INJURIES this is in millions 7,179,600 the more they obstructed God the more He brought the dirt to the surface Million 7,179, 600 then that must be multiplied by two for attempted and coommitted torts the first 7 179 600 is for attempted TORTS then the second amount is for committed TORTS 14, 359, 200 tort. the value per book for easch TORT is between 100 to 300 thousand dollars meaning that if i were to mulptiply that amount by the value of TORTS taking the lowest 100,000 pertort the total amoUnt would be too great for any court of law to bear on my way to law school I requested settlement instead of a computation of ALL THE torts trillion $1 435 920 000 000 THE u.s. WOULD NOT HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO PAY ME EVEN AT THE LOWEST VALUE God just did it again HE opened the red sea and the steps crossing were too much for Moses to beaR. . STOP RACIAL SEGREGATION Option 1 $5.00 USD Option 2 $10.00 USD Option 3 $25.00 USD Option 4 $100.00 USD Option 5 $500.00 USD Option 6 $1,000.00 USD SONY ROY AMERICA IS THE SAFEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET RELAX I WOULD NEVER SUE MY OWN COUNTRY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA I MY CASE JHAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND I AM NOT SUING THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ONLY EMPLOYEES THAT REFUSED TO OBEY THE LAW. BELOW ARE THE TEN ALLEGED FRAUDS AS PRESENTED TO CNN ND TA FEW SALIENT VIOLATIONS TO PROVE MY POINT AS VIDEO TAPED HERE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMMUt5MemFg I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO TALK FOR A LONG TIME AND I WAS OBSTRUCTED NOW HERE IT COMES FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH . A NATURALIZED AMERICAN CITIZEN AND NATIVE OF HAITI REPORTING. A FORMER MULTI-MILLIONAIRE SELF-MADE in AMERICA ONE WHO HAS BEEN DEPRIVED of HIS HUMAN RIGHTS, HIS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN THE U.S. some of the salient torts in the case for which the compelling constitutional conflict would be bigger than the United States can contain: 1) EXTRINSIC FRAUDS A MAJOR RED FLAG AT THE START WOULD SEND EVERYBODY SEARCHING for such departure derails the pocess at the start, vitiates the process and create the case for a miscarriage of justice it was extrinsic frauds that moved all three prongs of investigative conspiracy, namely the MALFEASANCE, the MISFEASANCE abd THE NON-FEASANCE, AND NO RULE 56 APPLIED AND NO RULE 59 APPLIED AND NO RULE 60 -B APPLIED AND NO WAIVER GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF WHICH IS INVOLUNTARY WAIVERS A MAJOR TRANGRESSION OF THE LAW WHEN A JUDGE IS FAILING TO INFORM THE PARTIES. AND NO DUE PROCESS ANALYZED AT AL SO SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS WERE ALSO MISSING ON THE RECORDS. MAKING DECISIONS FOR OTHER UNITED STATES CITIZENS. THAT IS SHEER UNDERGROUND STUFF AND THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES BARRSUCH FALACIES I WILL NOT DRINK SUCH LIES UNDER OATH AND THE U.N WILL NOT EITHER AS THEY TOLD ME. 2) NO FBI INVOLVED IN AN INVESTIGATIVE CASE THE FBI WAS AVAIBLE AS OUR GRETEST SYSTEMIC TOOLS AND NOT CONTACTED ) if the judges are found right the State OF FLORIDA would bEin violation of TITLE SIX OF THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT AND THAT IS SERIOUS FOR SO MANY YEARS. NO RULE 56 APPLIED AND NO RULE 59 APPLIED AND NO RULE 60 -B APPLIED AND NO WAIVER GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF WHICH IS INVOLUNTARY WAIVERS A MAJOR TRANGRESSION OF THE LAW WHEN A JUDGE IS FAILING TO INFORM THE PARTIES. AND NO DUE PROCESS ANALYZED AT AL SO SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS WERE ALSO MISSING ON THE RECORDS. MAKING DECISIONS FOR OTHER UNITED STATES CITIZENS. THAT IS SHEER UNDERGROUND STUFF AND THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES BARRSUCH FALACIES I WILL NOT DRINK SUCH LIES UNDER OATH AND THE U.N WILL NOT EITHER AS THEY TOLD ME. this is not something to try at home for any human being who do something like that threatens the srecurity of America nd also the United Nations having more than 130 supportIng members in it TAKE ALL THEIR CLUES FRO THE UNITED STATES. I CANNOT INGEST THIS I ACNNOT MASTICATE SUCH I CANNOT SALIVATE IT AND I CANNOT DIGEST IT EITHER IT MUST GO BCLK THAT IS THE LAW AND THE LAW IS ALL I HAVE. SUCH LIES UNDER OATH, WILL NOT MAKE THE U.N EASY AND HAPPY. WFOR GOOD CAUSE AS THEY TOLD ME. 3) NO DA OFFICE INVOLVED AND AVAILABLE TO ALL AUTHORITIES NO RULE 56 APPLIED AND NO RULE 59 APPLIED AND NO RULE 60 -B APPLIED AND NO WAIVER GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF WHICH IS INVOLUNTARY WAIVERS A MAJOR TRANGRESSION OF THE LAW WHEN A JUDGE IS FAILING TO INFORM THE PARTIES. AND NO DUE PROCESS ANALYZED AT AL SO SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS WERE ALSO MISSING ON THE RECORDS. MAKING DECISIONS FOR OTHER UNITED STATES CITIZENS. THAT IS SHEER UNDERGROUND STUFF AND THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES BARRSUCH FALACIES I WILL NOT DRINK SUCH LIES UNDER OATH AND THE U.N WILL NOT EITHER AS THEY TOLD ME. . 4) NO HUD STEERING VIOLATIONS APPLIED AT ALL. THE HUD IS LIVID ABOUT ITS LAWS LOW KEY INDIVIDUALS MAY NOT KNOW THE LAWS BUT SEASONED PEOPLE KNOW AD THERE IS NO TLREANCE FOR MISLEADING ALL COURTS IN THE U.S. NO RULE 56 APPLIED AND NO RULE 59 APPLIED AND NO RULE 60 -B APPLIED AND NO WAIVER GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF WHICH IS UINVOLUNTARY WAIVERS. THAT IS SHEER UNDERGROUND STUFF AND THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES BARR SUCH FALACIES. NO WHERE IN THE LAW DOE IT SAY THE CITIZEN OF THE U.S MUST CCEPT ALL LIKE THAT BU=Y THE WAY THE JUDGES AE NOT THE COURT AND IF THEY ERR THEY CAN BE CORRECTED BY THE NOBLES OF JUSTICES. I WILL NOT DRINK SUCH LIES UNDER OATH AND THE U.N WILL NOT EITHER AS THEY TOLD ME. 5) - NO FCC INVOLVED AT ALL AND YET, AVAIABLANBLE TO ALL. NO RULE 56 APPLIED AND NO RULE 59 APPLIED AND NO RULE 60 -B APPLIED AND NO WAIVER GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF WHICH IS INVOLUNTARY WAIVERS A MAJOR TRANGRESSION OF THE LAW WHEN A JUDGE IS FAILING TO INFORM THE PARTIES. AND NO DUE PROCESS ANALYZED AT AL SO SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS WERE ALSO MISSING ON THE RECORDS. MAKING DECISIONS FOR OTHER UNITED STATES CITIZENS. THAT IS SHEER UNDERGROUND STUFF AND THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES BARRSUCH FALACIES I WILL NOT DRINK SUCH LIES UNDER OATH AND THE U.N WILL NOT EITHER AS THEY TOLD ME. 6) EXTRINSIC FRAUDS SET UP IN THISSHEER BSTRUCTION CASE . THERE IS A TRAP SET IN THIS CASE AND THE GOD OF HEAVEN ALREADY DEMONSTRATED TO ME THAT SOMEONE SITS IN A CORNER IS TRYING TO DISPARAGE YOU TO THEIR OWN ADVANTAGE MEANING WHATEVER SHOULD GO IN THEIR COLUMN THEY ARE BRINGING IT ON YOU SO THIS LAST MOTION IS TRICKLY LIMITED TO FINALITY NOT FURTHER ARGUMENTS AS SUCH WOULD RENDER THIS MOTION NULL AND VOID THEIS IS DESIGNED SIMPLY FOR FINALITY AND NOT FO FURTHER DCUSSIONS FOR TOO MUCH ILLS HAVE BEEN DONE AND I WILL NOT SUFFER SUCH ANY LONGER. FURTHERMORE NO RULE 56 APPLIED AND NO RULE 59 APPLIED AND NO RULE 60 -B APPLIED AND NO WAIVER GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF WHICH IS INVOLUNTARY WAIVERS A MAJOR TRANGRESSION OF THE LAW WHEN A JUDGE IS FAILING TO INFORM THE PARTIES. AND NO DUE PROCESS ANALYZED AT AL SO SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS WERE ALSO MISSING ON THE RECORDS. MAKING DECISIONS FOR OTHER UNITED STATES CITIZENS. THAT IS SHEER UNDERGROUND STUFF AND THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES BARRSUCH FALACIES I WILL NOT DRINK SUCH LIES UNDER OATH AND THE U.N WILL NOT EITHER AS THEY TOLD ME. 7) NO DOJ INVOLVED YET, AVAILABLE TO ALL ND I WILL NOT STAND FOR SUCH TRANSGRESSIONS ASA U.S CITIZEN IF THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT IS INVOLVED AND THE DOJ ENSURES THAT THE COUNTRY STAYS CURRENT HOW COME THEY WERE NEVER CONTACTED ? NO RULE 56 APPLIED AND NO RULE 59 APPLIED AND NO RULE 60 -B APPLIED AND NO WAIVER GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF WHICH IS INVOLUNTARY WAIVERS A MAJOR TRANGRESSION OF THE LAW WHEN A JUDGE IS FAILING TO INFORM THE PARTIES. AND NO DUE PROCESS ANALYZED AT AL SO SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS WERE ALSO MISSING ON THE RECORDS. MAKING DECISIONS FOR OTHER UNITED STATES CITIZENS. THAT IS SHEER UNDERGROUND STUFF AND THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES BARRSUCH FALACIES I WILL NOT DRINK SUCH LIES UNDER OATH AND THE U.N WILL NOT EITHER AS THEY TOLD ME. 8) NO INVESTAGATON AT ALL: HAD THE FBI OURDREM TEAN WERE INVOLVED IN MINUTES THEY WOULD HAVE DISCOVERED THEPRESECEOF A WANTED FIUGITIVEAND WOULDTAKE TE NECESSARY STEPS TO SECURE TE NATION GAIN> THAT WAS NOT DONE AND INSTED< PEOPLE ARE PARASCOPING ME WITH THEITR CEL PHONE AND SME WILL BBE LITERALLY ARRESTED AS MY ATTRNEYS WANT T DO NOE THYA HAVE NO PROBBLE CAU NO WARANT AND MY FACE IS ALL OVER THEIR CELL PHONE THE FOURRTH AMENDMENT FORBIDS THIS YOUR FACE IS AN INTEGRAL ART OF YOUR BEING. A MAN IS INNOCENT AS THE WALTON COUNTY DECKARED ME TO BE A MAN IS INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY NOT UNTIL MADE GUILTY NOT UNTILL GOUNFD GILTY A GENTEAN < THE OTHER DAY THOUGHT H KNEWMORE AD ADVANCED THAT CRAZY IDEA THAT WAS THE RECVERSE A MAN IS GUILTY UTIL PROVEN INNOCENT THE AN SIMLT Y REVERSED THE LAW ON MY FACE WHAT IF I DID NOT KNOW AI WOULD GO AROUND AD REPET INSANITIES. WHEN WE DO NOT NOW THAT IS OK. BUT WE MUST SEEK TO KNOW THE TRUTH. NO INVESTIGATION DONE AND A FUGITIVE ON THE LOOSE THAT IS WHY I INsIST ON HAVING AN INVESTIGATION. 9) NO 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT TITE SIX REGARDS AT ALL . THAT ACT WAS SO SUBLIME WHEN CONGRESS PASSED IT. THE BULLET PROOF VEST WAS SHATTERED BY THE JUDGES AND I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY IT HAPPENED IN THIS FASHION. AND THE JUDGES DECLARED: THE ROYS OWN PROPERTY IN AN AREA THAT HISTORICALLY HAS BEEN RCIALY SEGREAGATED THE JUDGES STATED A FACT IN MY VIEW THE ROYS OWN THAT IS A FACT THAT I KNOW THE REST IS JARGN TO ME UNTIL THE FBI DOES THEIR WORK. . SUPPOSE YOU MET ME ONTHE STREET AND AFTER SAYING YOUR REGULAR SALUTATIONS YOU ASKED ME HOW IS YOUR LITTLE SON DOING IN SCHOOL? IS HE STILL NUMBER ONE IN MATH IN THE STATE OF MARYLAMD? AND I ANSWERED THUS, AH! MY SON USED TO BE A STRAIGHT A STUDENT AND NUMBER ONE WHEN I LIVED WITH HIM THAT WOULD BE AN AUTOMATIC PAST IN LINGUISTIC BY THE WAY HE IS REGARDLESS, THE LITTLE FELLOW IS BRIGHT. . . . BUT SUPPOSE YOU MET ME AND ASKED HOW IS YOUR SON DOING IN SCHOOL? AND I SAID THUS: MY SON HISTORICALLY HAS BEEN A STRAIGHT "A" STUDENT THAT IS A PERFECT LINGUISTICAL STATEMENT DENOTING THAT HE CONTINUES TO NE STRAIGHT A REGARDLESS OF THE TUMULTUOUS SEPARATION HERE WITH MY WIFE AND WE HAVE BEEN TOGETHER AT THE AGE FF THIRTEEN DO YOU NOW SEE THE CONFLICT.? THE JUDGES EMITTED SMETHING HERE THT POSSIBLYCSN OUT EVE THE UNITED STATES BACK AGAINST THE WALL. BEYOND THE U.S. THERE ARE MORE THAN 130 MENBER NATIONS AND IF AMERICA SETS THE PACE BCAUSE OF WHAT THE JUDGES DID DON'T YOU THINK THEY CAN FOLLOW THROUGH? AND THEY CAN DO IT WIYTH IMPUNITY IF THE US OR THE STATE O FORIDA PER THE NON-MARGINAL STATEMENT ID IT. WE HAVE AN INTERNATIONAL PROBLEMS HERE IN MY VIEW. THT CA BE ADDRESSED BY THE U.S. FOR WE HAVE THE STRINGST JUDICIAL IN THE WOLD OUR PREMENMINANCE OF JUSTICE IS SUGHT AFTER AND OUR VENEER OF DEMOCRACY IS IN HIGH DMAND W CAN D THIS HOME THAT IS ONE OF THE RESONS IT TOOK ME A LONG TIME 10) NO CIA YET, AVAILABLE AND NOT USED TO OBSTRUCT, WE MUST REDUCE THE KEVL T ALL THE JUDGES FAILEDME GREATLY FOR ) IT WAS EXTRINCSUC FRAUDS THA SKIPPED THE CIANOT TOMING; Extrinsic fraud is fraud that "induces one not to present a case in court or deprives one of the opportunity to be heard [or] is not involved in the actual issues . 9)NO DA OFFICE) IT WAS EXTRINSIC FRAUDS THAT REFUSED THE ASSISTACE OF THE DA OFICE WITH A WANTED FUGITIVE ATTHE CENTER STAGE AND NOBODY CARED THE WALTON COUNTY USED A WANTED FUGITIVE POSSIBLY HSRBORED SUCH WOULD CAUSE THE GREAT FBI AGENTS TO FROWN A WANTED FUGITIVE IS A DANGER TO OUR CHILDREN THAT WAS EXTRINSIC FRAUDS CLEARLY TO DEVIATE THE PROCESS AND PLACE TE SPOTLIGHT ON THEWANTED FUGITIVE, THIS WANTED FUGITIVE OR EXTRNSIC FRAUFD IS ABOUT TO PERCOLATE THE ENTIRE RECORD AND I LOST MORE THAN FIFTEEN MIILION DOLLARS IN THAT GAME I CALL IT THE UNDERGROUNDS GAME WHILE I WAS LOOSING MORE THAN FIFTEEN MILLIONS DOLLARS ON AMERIVAN SOIL AND THE LOSS OF AFFECTION WITH MY WIFE OF THIRTY FIVRE YEARS IT WAS EXTRINSIC FRAUDS THATDESPISED THE HOMELAND SECURITY IT WAS EXTRINSIC FRAUDS THAT REMOVED THE HUD OUT IF ITSPLACE IT WAS EXTRINSIC FRAUDS THAT FAILED THE FCC FOR GRAMMATICAL ERROR AND TRUTHFULNESS 11) NO HUD INVOLVED AT ALL THAT COULD CURB THE JUDGES GOOD SENSES ON NOT TOUCHING THE FEDERAL 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT. IT WAS EXTRINSIC FRAUDS THAT NEARLY DESTROYED MY CIONFIDENCE IN THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROCESS WEREN'IT FOR THE NEW BOOK I AM WRITING TEACHING THAT THERE IS A VAST DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE CLEAR AMERICA THAT PRESIDEBNT OBANA WANT TO LAST AND THE UNDERGROUNDS WHERE PEOPLE MAKE THEMSELVES THE STANDARD AND THERE IS NO LAW LADIES AND GEBNTLEMEN INTROIDUCING THE SECOND AMERICA WHERE EVERY THING GOES AND I CALLED IT NOT AMERICA AT ALL BUT UNDERGROUNDS it was extrund=siuc frauds to by pass thefbi so rigid uin their investigative process that is systemic by the U.S. Government to oce a plaintiff or defendant to change ther view or interprate the facts in a Different way. Extrinsic frauds were the pavers of this case that lead solely to frauds from the start an frauds unresponded an unsanswered. LIKE THE TEN FRAUDS UPON THE COURT OIN THIS CASE. AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: Extrinsic fraud is fraud that "induces one not to present a case in court or deprives one of the opportunity to be heard [or] is not involved in the actual issues ...." It can involve fraud on the court, but is not necessarily the same. for instance when the WALTON COUNTY defendants declare themselves the winner such derailed the whole case for it was accepted by the arbitrating Judges. that was a false declaration since it was prior to me searching the case more thoroughly to find the missing components. 1) EXTRINSIC FRAUDS EXISTED in MANY AEAS INDICATED THE MALICIOUSNESS OF THIS CASE. 2) Extrinsic frauds eisted at the start with the presence of a fraudulent Fugitive pausing for the Walton County against the will of the FBI. 3) EXTRINSIC FRAUDS EXISTED on may11 2005, whn thre was no o presente at all 12) perjury WHAT IS PERJURY? Perjury is the criminal offense of lying under oath. A perjury charge may be brought when someone makes a false statement after being sworn in or promising to tell the truth in a legal situation. For instance, a person giving testimony on the stand during a court case who tells a lie may be charged with perjury. Someone who lies during a deposition, or who lies on a signed declaration or affidavit can also be charged with this offense 13) FELONY WHAT IS IT?Criminal fines may also be imposed for felony charges, often in the amounts of thousands of dollars. Under traditional common law, felonies were called “true crimes,” and usually included serious offenses such as: homicide, rape, arson, burglary, robbery, larceny, escaping from a prison, and assisting in a felony.Sep 8, 2015 felonies were called IN THE LD DAYS “true crimes,” and usually included serious offenses such as: homicide, rape, arson, burglary, robbery, larceny, escaping from a prison, and assisting in a felony.Sep 8, 2015 I LOST MY PROPERTY AN THAT WAS APRAISED WITH THE COLLATERA;L AT OVER FIFTEEN MILLIONS DOLLARS there WILL BE VARIOUS COUNTS OF FELONY AND THEY ARE CRIMESTTEMPTED AND COMMITTED HERE. 14) FORGERY CHARGES The penalty for forgery, counterfeiting or, altering documents and instruments often varies according to the type of document altered, with important government documents at the top of the penalty list. forgery (also known as "uttering a false instrument") is a serious offense, punishable as a felony in all fifty states and by the federal government. Forgery involves the making, altering, use, or possession of a false writing in order to commit a fraud. It can occur in many forms, from signing another person's name on a check to falsifying one's own academic transcript. When the subject of forgery is currency, it is also called counterfeiting. The rule thus expressly provides that either intrinsic or extrinsic fraud will constitute ground for upsetting a judgment if a motion is made within one year. But whether not only extrinsic but also intrinsic fraud will constitute sufficient ground for upsetting a judgment after the expiration of the year period is uncertain. The plain language of the rule seems to give AND THE JUDGS REFUSED TO REOPEN THE UNAVISABKE JUDGEENT SINCE OCTOBER 2011. USING THE DOCTRINE OF ATTRITIION THY DELAYEDEVERYTHING TILL NOW I JUTCAN'T FATHOME SUCH WHILE GIVING carte blanche to a court to grant relief at anytime for any type of fraud. But recent judicial interpretations of the rule point out questions that deserve onsideration deserve consideration eisted on may 12, when the county used the fugitive document 2). 3) PERJURY: We can’t always be certain, but those who are caught knowingly misleading a court face serious criminal charges of perjury. To “perjure” yourself is to knowingly make false or misleading statements under oath or to sign a legal document you know to be false or misleading. You visited this page on 11/12/15. AND THEY ARE CRIMES 4) FORGERY: the action of forging or producing a copy of a document, signature, banknote, or work of art. counterfeiting, falsification, faking, copying, pirating "guilty of forgery"a forged or copied document, signature, banknote, or work of art fake, counterfeit, fraud, sham, imitation, replica, copy, pirate copy; informalphony "the painting was a forgery 6) 5) NO NOTICE BY THE FOURTH AMENDMENT NO PROBABLE CAUSE BY THE FOURTH AMENDMENT 7) NO SEARCH BY THE FOURTH AMENDMENT • . plural noun: forgeries synonyms " 6) NO WRITTEN COMPLAINTS ON MAY 11, 2005 7) NO F.I.R. BY ALL INVESTIGATIVE BODIES 8) NO F.B.BI. INVOLVED AT ALL AND AN INVESTGATION WAS DONE ACCORDING TO MRS. PATBLACKSHEAR 9) NO CIA INVOLVED OR REQUESTED AT ALL 10) NO INVITATION TO COME ON MY PROPERTY TRESPASSING IN OCTOBER 2004 AND MAY 2005 11) NO HOMELAND SECURITY INVOLVED 12) NO FCC INVOLVED 13) NO HUD INVOLVED 14) MALICIOUS PROSECUTION NOT TO BE ATTACHED TO fEDERAL JUSDGES AMD CRIMINAL LAWERS 15) GRAND LARCENY :Larceny is a crime involving the unlawful taking of the personal property of another person. It was an offence under the common law of England and became an offence in jurisdictions which incorporated the common law of England into their own law. THERE ARE PETTY LARCENIES AND GRAND LARCENY I BELIVE FOR THE sTATE OF FLORIDA WHEN EVER VTHE PROPERTY LOST EXCEEDS $1,000 IT IS CONSUDERED GRAND LARCENY Overview of Florida Theft Laws: Florida laws use the legal term "theft" to describe a variety of property crimes, including larceny, stealing, misappropriation, conversion, and other offenses. In general, theft involves the unauthorized taking or use of another person's property. In a theft case, the prosecutor must prove several elements of the crime. - See more at: http://statelaws.findlaw.com/florida-law/florida-theft-laws.html#sthash.xAuXxtLc.dpuf 16) no JURY TRIAL THE CHIEF JUDGE PROMISED AND SCHEDULED JURY TRIAL TWICE AND IT WAS ABORTED OR NEGLCTED WITHOUT PROPWER WAIVERS ASA LAW SATUDENT TO BE I KNOW OF VTHE GRAVITY OF DOINGTHINGS WITH OUT WIVERS AND LEAVING PEOPLE DOUNBTING THE COUTRT'S INTEGRITY SO W HAVE TWO TORTS IN ONE NO JURY TH OTHER NO WAIVER: SUCH OBSTRUCT JUTICE AND LEAVS A LOT OF QUESTIONS IN THE MINDS OF THE LITIGANTS. BVIOLATIONS OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT AND THE INVOLUNTARY WAIVER RIGHTS. 17) NO IMPARTIAL ARBITER : A FAITHFUL ARBITER WILL NOT BE CORERCED TO OVERLOOK IN NONFESANCE THE ACT OF MALFEASANCE. THERE WAS CLEAR BIAS ON THE RECORD AND I SEPTEMBER 25 2008 ITWAS CONFIRMED BY THE BEHAVIORAL MISCONDUCT OF THE CHIEF JUDGE SHE STATED TO TH AUDIENCE OF WHICH I WA THE SOLE BLACK MAN THAT IT IS OK FO ANY BODY NOT TO WANT SOME PEOPLE TO LIVE NEXT DOOR AND I AM THE SOLE BLACK MAN WHAT DO YOU MEAN SHEER RACIAL BIAS. 18) NO WAIVERS AT ALL THE CHIEF JUDGE WAS SO ARROGANT THTOWARD ME THAT SJHE DID NOT STOP AT ALL TO SEE WHAT SHE WQAS DOING IFSHE WERE IGORANT THAT WOULD BE UBNDERSTANDABL BUT THE CHIEF IS A JD JUGS AND JD JUGES IN TE uNITED STATES ARE HIGHLY COMPETENT AD I AM UNDER OATH HERE FOR THE CHIEF JUDGE WERE SHE IGNORANT WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO CONCOCT SUCH DAMNING COUP TO MY PEOPLE MY RACE MY COLOR AND Y NATIONAL ORGIN CMING UP. 19) NO RULE 56 BY THE JUDGES AND SUMMARY JUDMENT WAS ENTERED. LISTN PEOPLE NO SUMMARY JUDGMENR CAN BE ENTERED WITHOUT RULE 56 IT IS LIKE A STRAINERWHNE SQUEEZING ORANGES TO MAKE JUICE IF NO STRAINER THEN ALL TH RESIDUE WOULD GO IN THE JUICE THE UNITED STATES HAS LAWS AND THE JUDGES ARE NOT THE LAWS OF THE U.S. TO THE DEGREE THE JUDGE COMPLIES WITH THE LAW HE OR SHE CAN BE THE 850 LBS GUERILLAS BUT BO LAWS A JUDGE IS LIK EA FEATHER ALL JUDGES TAKE THE LWS TO ACCUSE ANYBODY . THEREFORE I CHARGE TH JUDGES IN MISFEASANCE HERE FOR THEY ATTEMPTED TO PERVERT THE SYSTEM TO THEIR OWN INTEREST TO IT THE WALTON COUNTY. 20) DISCRIMINATION THE 11TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATED THAT DISCRIMINATION WOULD NOT BE TOLERATED THTIS WHAT I WENT THORUGH AFTER THEY STTAED SO THEY SAID THEY WENT THROUGH MY CASE AND EVR FOUND ANY DISCRIMINATION AND THE MOST PALPABLE TRANSGRESSION IS AGANST ME. IS THE LAW EQUAL OR AM I DEALING WIYTH UNDERGROUNDS MENTALITY HERRE AND LAWLESS AMERICA THAT REFUSES TO BE CAUGHT . A LAWSUIT ACCORDING TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IS NOT A GAME OF SKILL WHERE ONE PERSON CAN LOOSE BCAUSE OF A MISTAKE THE COURT DECALARES. I DO NOT KNOW WHAT HAPPENED HERE MAY BE THE FEDERAL JUDGES THOUGHT OF MY COUNTRY NATIONAL ORIGIN MY COMPLEXION DARK ON MY SKIN AN MY RACE BEING BLACK THE THREE AND DECIDED I AM NOT A CITIZEN THERE FORE I COULD NOT BE TREATED AS A CITIZEN THR IS NO BIG I AND LITTLE US IN COURT URA LEX SED LEX THE LATIN SAYS TH LAW IS HARD BUT IT IS THE LAW. 21) DISCRIMINATION COUNT II FURTHERMORE SUBSEQUENT TO THIS MAJOR FIASCO BY THE APPEAL COURT WE HAVE ANOTHER MAJOR PROBLEM IF YOU RECALL I JUST SAID THAT THE 11TH CIRCUIT COURT O APPEAL STATED THRE WAS NO DISCRIMINATION AT ALL HRE IS COUNT #2 THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF THE COMMISSIONERS MR. SCOTT BRANNON WAS CAUGHT WITH THE FOLLOWING EXPRESSION IN HIS E-MAIL "HELP A NIGGA OUT" SOMETHING THE FEDERAL COUNSELORS AND AVISOS TOLD ALL THE COMMISSIONERS SINVCE 2009 TO STAY AWAY FROM . NOW IN 2012 SCOTT BRANNON IS CAIGHT AND THAT WAS MAJOR TV CAUGHT. HER IS THE THRILLING CONFESSION OF MR. BRANNON THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BORD OF COMMISSIONERS HOW CAN OUR CLEAN JUGES DEFEND THESE PEOPLE THST WAS THE PROBLEM CLEANESS CANNOT DEFEND UNCLEANNESS IF SUCH TAKS PLACE A TAINTING WILL TAKE FOLLOW INEBVITABLY FOR, AS THE MASTER SO ARE THE SERVANTS.THE 11TH CIRCUIT COURT AOF APPEAL WAS WRONG INMY ESTIMATION. AND I VENTURE TO SA THAT ONCE THE DISTRICT COURT IS VITIATED, THE VITIATION WILL MIGRATE TO OTHER COURTS AND THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED HERE . BY THE WAY IT WOULD BE GOOD TO KNOW WHO THIS GUY IS HE WAS THE OVERSEER OF MY PROPERTIES WHEN LOST CAN YOU PUT TWO PLUS TWO TOGETHER THEN I HIRED A LAWYER TO TALK WITH HIM ESPECIALLY AND I PAID THATLAWYER 850 DOLLARS FOR A FIFTEEN MINUTE CONVERSATION WITH MR. BRANNIN. AND HERE IS THE RESULT HE BROUGHT MR. BRANNON STATED THAT HE DROVE HIS CAR TVLOSE TO MY PROPERTY AND SAW NOTHING WRONG THAT MISTR ROY WAS DOING THAT IS NICE EXCEPT IT DIES THERE. THAT WAS MY NO-LOOK PASS COMMISSIIONER CLOSED HIS YES ON WHAT THE WALTON COUNTY WASDOING TO HURT ME THOUGH HE SAW TH TRUTH BUT HE FAILED TO ANNOUNCE IT LEAVING ME AND FIFTEEN MILLION DOLARS WOTH OF PROPERTIES UNATTENDED I TOLD YOU IN THE TRIANGLE OFFENSE THERE IS A COMBO HERE IS THE COMBO THE WALTON COUNTY WAS APPOINTED IN THIS CABAL TO BE ONLY MALFEASANCE TO COMMIT NEFARIOUS ACT I WANT TO CONTGRATULATE THE RESTON CITY FOR HOSTING THIS AND I WILL MAKE IT KNOW SOON HOW THEY DO NOT KNOW THAT HISTORY IS INTO MAKING RIGHT HERE SOME THINK THT THEY ARE DEALING WITH ME THIS CASE IS GOD ' S CASE AND NOT MINE THAT IS WHAT EVERYTHING IS BNOW FALLING IN PLACE I AM BUT A PION THAT GOD FAVOED TO PLAY A PART IN THIS MOVIE AND I DO NOT EVEN KNOWTH ELINES IAM PLAYING BUT WAIT ON HIM HE IS DOING IT NOT ME AT ALL. HOW CAN THE WALTON COUNTY BE DOING AND COMMITTIMNG MALFEASANCE BY ATTACKING ME AND NON FEASANCE BY NLOOK [ASS THAT IS BEYOND ME. BUT NOW THEY ARE DOING NONFEASANCE A NONFEASANCE IS SUPPOSED TO BE INVISIBLE AN THE WALTON COUNTY IS INVOLVED? HEIN HEIN FOR THE COUNTY THINKS NO ONE IS LOOKING BUT GOD DOES NOT MISS A THING IT IS BLOW PER BLOW IF THE WALTON COUNTY WERE HRE THEY WOULD CRY TEARS BITTERTEARS NEXT WEKK I WILL COLCLOSE THIS POST AND SEND IT OUT BUT I GUARANTEE YOU TH CHIEF JUDGE PERHAPS DOID NOT KNOW WHAT I NOW KNOW FROM =GOD ALMIGHTY HE REBVVEALETH SECRETS TO HIS SERVANTS THE PROPHETS. 22) NEXT MORE COUNTS OF DISCRIMINATION THE U.S. CENSUS BUREAU 2000 REFKECTED THAT IN THE AREA AWHERE MY PROPERTU WAS LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE COMMUNITY IS OWNED OR INHBITED BY BLCKS YOU THINK I WILL RAISE CAN WHER THR IS NO FIRE IF THERE IS FIRE AT THE BOTTOM THERE WILL BE SMOKE ON TOP. THE FEDERAL CENSUS BUREAU CANNOT LIE WHAT YOU SEE AIS WHAT YOU GET. THEY DETERMINE THE AREA AS HAVING PROBLEMS AND THE JUDGES DID NOT KNOW? I WISHED THESE WERE MADE AVAILABL TO ME I WOULD CERTAINLY REFRAIN FROM DOING THE EXPLOITS I STARTED DOWN THERE. 23) NET: MORE COUNT OF DISCRIMINATION THE FEDERAL JUSGES STATED IN WRITING THREE TIMES NO DENYING OF SUCH IS POAASSIBL TTWICE IN 2007 AND ONVCE IN T2009 THAT I OWN PROPERTY IN AN AREA THAT HIS HERE IS THE CONFESSION OF MR. SCOTT BRANNON THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BORD OF COMMISSIONERS IN FLORIDA Under these circumstances … I have not handled myself in a way befitting of someone elected to serve the people of Walton County,” Brannon said in a 10-page statement he read at Tuesday’s County Commission meeting. 24) THIS IS DAMNING THE COURT JUDGES ANRE ENTERING WITHOUTHE FBI, THE HOLAND SECURITY THE FCC THE CIA THE HUD? TEN FRAUDS IS A VERY HIGH NUMBER FOR A NON ATTORNEY TO FIND ANYWHERE. FRAUDS UPON THE COURT 25) THE WORST OF IT ALL THE JUDGES FELT SO CONFIDENT IN UNDERGROUNDS THAT THEY DID NOT BOTHER ANSWERING THE TEN FRAUDS UPON THE COURT CHARGES LVELED AGAINST THEM THST WAS A SACARILEGE NOT THST I DO NOT UNDERSTAND H EIMPOT OF THE WORD BUT THE STAE OF FLORIDA REFERS TO MAY PROPERTY AS SACRED RIGHTS THERE FORI BORROWED THEIR LINE. THAT IS PITIFUL NAD DAMNING FOR THE UNITED STATES BEFORE THE UNITED NATUIONS THIS IS MUCH BIGGER THAN THE U.S. WHY? WHY? WHY? WHUOLD JUDGES DO SUCH IS IT BECAUSE THEY TRUTED THE WHITE FUGITIVE WORDS OR BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO POTECT GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES? THE FBI WILL TELL AND ALL THE EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS WILL BE REVEALED AND BY THE THERE SHOULD NEVER NE EXPARTE COMMUNICATIONS ANYWHERE 26) SOME MORE DISCRIMINATION COUNTS UPON PURCHASING MY LAND I AM COMING HIME NOW, NATURALLY I VISITED SOME DAYS AFTER TO INWUIRE ABOUT MY PROPERTY BOUNDRES LIKE NAY REALESTATE DEVELOPER WOULD AND A WHITE WOMN APPROACHED ME TO INFOME ME THAT LAST YEAR EANING 20032 HER GARDENER CAME TO WORK AND HE WAS BLACK NAND H LOSTHER PLAE O THE ADDRESS AN WENT BEXT DOOR TO AKS THIS IS NOW FOM THE NEIGHBORHOO ND TH NEIGHBOR CALLED TH POLICE ON THE BLAACK GUY AND THST IS THE XTENT OF WHAT BLACK PEOPL DO IN THAT NEIGHBORGHOOD LET ME MAKE YOU CRY MY FOREMAN INFORMED MME IONE DAY THAT THERE VWS AN AREA WHERE SLAVERUY WAS STILL PRACTICED I SID WHAT? HE SAID MR. ROY I WILL TAKE YOU THERE ANYTIME SO ONE DAY HE REPORTED FOR WORK AN HE WAS SICJ LIKE A DOG SICK SICK AN TWO WORKERS I ORGOT THEIR NAME RUSHED TO THE FONT O THE PROPERTY TO INOM ME I QUICKLY CALLED TONYA MY NP THAT STANDS FO NURSE PRACTICIONER ME INE DAY TO REQUEST A FAVIR TH GUY HAD NO MEUCATUION WITH HIM AN H IS AFLICTED WIT THIS TRIUNE DIESEASE H HAD HIGH BLOOFD PRESSURE H HAD DIABETES AN HE HAD HEART PROBLES THE MAN WAS REALLY A WALKING DEAD MAN SO TH EMINUTE I HEARD THAT I CALLE AND TONYA A GOOD FRID AND POSSIBLE INVESTOTOR IN MY CASTLE AT THE TIME TOK ME TO PICKIT UP AT A CERATIN PAHARMACAY AND I UWICKLY RAN BACK WHERE TESH WA TO TELL HIM H TOL ME POINTBLANK SONY IF YOU WANT ME TO DIE TAKE ME THER THEY DO 'T LIKE BLACKS AND IA M A BLACK MAN SWITH BRAIDED HAIR THY WIKL NOT SERVE ME I BEGGED TH MAN AND HE THEN TOLD ME TO WATC THE POPLE TALKING TO ME AND I SAID TESH ALMOST ALL MY FRINDS ARE WHITE AND INO MAN WCAN CM AT TH KEVELOF 17MILLION DOLLARS AND DWSPISE TYOUR WHITE OUTER PART VERY BODY IS IMPORTANT TO ME I DID NOT UNDERSTND THE GAMNE AS THE LADY TOLD M AT THE AIRPORT THIS IS TOO COMPLEXE NEXT WEK I WILLCONTINUE 28) GRAND LARCENYThe 29 FORGERY 30) FELONY AND MANY COUNTS 31 ]:NO \\MALICIOUS PERSECUTION EXENMPTING THE JUDGES AND LANDING ON THE WALTON COUNTY AND THE STSTE OF FLORIDA ALONE, Malicious Prosecution, False Imprisonment and Defamation ) NO VOLUNTARY WAIVER IS A TORT OF LAW. a) The malfeasance b) the misfeasance and the c) nonfeasance are enough to put this in the million counts HERE WE GO: 3 prongs above MULTIPLIED BY 3650 or ten years @ 365 days per year IS 10,950 TIMES TEN HARASSMENT IS = 1O9,500 TIMES 62 INJURIES this is in or 67 890.000 milliomn .00 TORTS times 55 torts we have 55 torts like these from the ten harassments such will bring us to more than 400 millions tort GOD JUST SHOCKED THE WORLD AND THERE WILL BE MORE the more they obstructed God the more He brought the dirt to the surface whwn ever in amny case you have an avalanche or a plethora of torts percolating in this ,anner you know it is the hands of God alone. He did it for Moses, for Elijah who beheaded 8650 people in one day He did for Sason who tied three hndred foxes together by hnd and set them on fire turning them into bomb. Million 6,789 torts in just one tort alone and i have at least TORTS if we dare multiply these tort by the number of days i spebnt in shame then we canT counT THEM ANY MORE TIMES TEN FULL YEAR S OF SUFFEREING SOThat was involuntary waive involuntary if it is not “the product of a rational intellect and a free will.” involuntary, and therefore unreliable. (People v. 6) FORGERY. IS NOT ONLY A CRIME BUT THERE WAS NO RULE 56 and MO rule 59 and no rule 60-b to redo it the computer industry is uptodate with a redo button you can undo an redo the court Judges simply refused, crying impossibility, and said we will not let you redo we will not undo neither will we let you redo it. We have a strict policy an that too was illegal. the in PROPRIA PERSONA CLAUSE states clearly that pleading is not a game. Someone came on behalf of the judges according to runors, and said, to me it was just a game while the Supreme Court states emphatically that pleadings is not a game . Lat. 'In ones own proper person.' To represent ones self in court without assistance of an attorney, at least 'on the record.' Often shortened to 'in pro per.' The U.S. Supreme Court observed in its unanimous decision in Kay v. Ehrler, 499 U.S. 432, Ethical considerations may make it inappropriate for him to appear as a witness. He is deprived of the judgment of an independent third party in framing the theory of the case, evaluating alternative methods of presenting the evidence, cross-examining hostile witnesses FBI WORK, formulating legal arguments, and in making sure that reason, rather than emotion, dictates the proper tactical response to unforeseen developments in the courtroom. The adage that 'a lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client' is the product of years of experience by seasoned litigators.. Id. at 437-438 TO DETECT IT. I do not agree with forgery and since it was obstructed the juges tohought it was orgotten obstruction is an abiusive conduct n not a willfull one. i ou keep anyone from klnowing that ia simply abusive. i a person gives ou consent tthat becomes a voluntary waiver I o not have to go to law school for that. neither do we want suh poor ecuse before any international attorney that ae now waiting or us we shoul never let anyone coerce us into doing suh thing. NO FIR, NO FBI INVOLVEMENT i VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED ALL THESE TORTS AND NO SUMMARY JUSGM,ENYT SHOULD GO THROUGH WITH RULE 566 ON THE RECO ONCE ORE I DECLARE THAT THE JUDGMENT IS NULL AND VOID BY LAW. this is of the utmost importance since it derails good judgment and causes everyboody to land in dobts of papers presented FOR THE WALTON COUNTY attempted and committed NO HOMELAND SECURITY THAT IS ANOTHER EXTRINSIC FRAUIDS FURTHER DERAILING THE MAINSTREAM AMERICA AND THE CONSTITUTION LEADING THE WHOLE WORLD ASTRAYHERE WE GO: 3 prongs above MULTIPLIED BY 36500 or ten years @ 365 days per year IS 109,500.00 TIMES TEN HARASSMENT IS = 1,O95,000 TIMES 62 INJURIES this is inmillions the mnore they obstructed God the more he bribgs the dirt to the surface Million 6,789,000 torts in just one tort alone and i have at least 55 TORTS if we dare multiply these tort by the number of days i spebnt in shame then we canT counT THEM ANY MORE TIMES TEN FULL YEAR S OF SUFFERING 11) perjury ia a crime and no onre can pay for {+money fora crime YOU DO THE CRIME YOU SERVE THE TIME BUT JAIL TIME EXCEPT IF THERE IS A SPECIAL CONSIDERATION. a) The malfeasance b) the misfeasance and the c) nonfeasance are enough to put this in the million counts CATEGORY HERE WE GO: 3 prongs above MULTIPLIED BY 3650 or ten years @ 365 days per year IS 10,950 TIMES TEN HARASSMENT IS = 1O9,500 TIMES 62 INJURIES this is in or 67 890.000 million TORTS times 55 torts. WHEN JESUS TOLD PETER TO CAST HIS NETS INTHE DEEP HE CAUGHT SO MAY FISH THATHE ASKED HIS NEIGHBORS TO HELP HIM CARRY THE FISH IN THEIR BOAT GOD TOLD ME NOT TO BACK DOWN AND GO NDGET THE FISH ON MY WAY TO LAW SCHOOL I MUST DO WHAT MY PARENTS TOLD ME TO DO TELL THE TRUTH SND WAIT AND AOBSERVE HOW FAR TRIUTH CAN LEAD SOMEONE. FELONY CHARGES attempted and later committed FELONY CHARGES AGAINST THE WALTON COUNTY UNCHECKED BY the state of florida which committed two severe TORTS a violation of the DUTY OF CARE AND A RECKLESS NEGLIGENCE IN DELEGATING SERIOUS DUTIES UNCHECKED TO THE WALTON COUNTY we have LIKE IT 55 torts FOR EACH HARASSMENT. like these from the ten harassments such will bring us to more than 400 millions tort GOD JUST SHOCKED THE WORLD AND THERE WILL BE MORE the more they obstructed God the more He brought the dirt to the surface whwn ever in amny case you have an avalanche or a plethora of torts percolating in this ,anner you know it is the hands of God alone. He did it for Moses, for Elijah who beheaded 8650 people in one day He did for Sason who tied three hndred foxes together by hnd and set them on fire turning them into bomb. Million 6,789 torts in just one tort alone and i have at least TORTS if we dare multiply these tort by the number of days i spebnt in shame then we canT counT THEM ANY MORE TIMES TEN FULL YEAR S OF SUFFEREING SOThat was involuntary waive involuntary if it is not “the product of a rational intellect and a free will.” involuntary, and therefore unreliable. (People v. 10)FELONY _ 9) NO WARRANT TO SEARCH 10) NO SEARCH 11) NO NOTICES ACCORDING TO THE FOURTH AMENDMENT INJURY OVERSIGHT NO INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 9) NO HOMELAND SECURITY 10)NO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 9) NO WARRANT TO SEARCH 10) NO SEARCH 11) NO NOTICES ACCORDING TO THE FOURTH AMENDMENT 12) NO HUMAN RIGHTS REGARDED as stated by the United nations where Our President Appears often if the UN gets a hold of my post we are fried for the UN will not stand for our violations especially when they have to face more than 130 nations and answer to them as the ir Constituents. ​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result is 14724+ 1302= 16,026 TORTS Carried forward 13) ​NO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS​ BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT 14) ​NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS 15) ​MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE​ 16) CONTUMACIOUS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE 17 ) DISCRIMINATION DUE TO RACE, COLOR, NATIONAL ORIGIN BIAS EXISTING in the area is a major conflict of LAW, banned by the 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS and known by the Judges at the start. That judgment dated 3/31/2009, should be set aside and the case should be reopened for quick finality without further litigations. 18) MAJOR OVERSIGHT TORT 17​) ​In 2012 SCOTT BRANNON - COMPELLING VIOLATION: 18) NO JUSTICE NEITHER THE APPEARANCE OF JUSTICE 19) NO GOVERNMENT INTEREST TO WARRANT SUCH CARELESSNESS 20) NO STATE INTEREST TO BACKUP SUCH EGREGIOUS BEHAVIOR 21) RACKETEERING CHARGES 22)​MALICIOUS PROSECUTION 23) NO IMPARTIAL ARBITER 32654 TORTS Carried forward 24) I CLAIM AN ENTRY OF DEFAULT 25​) NO SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS 26) NO PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS ALSO 28) NO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAWS​. 29) ​EXTRINSIC FRAUDS:. 30) INJURY)multipliers DEPRIVATION OF MY CIVIL 31) INJURY) DEPRIVATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 32) INJURY #VI. ) ) DEPRAVATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TORTS 33) INJURY #VII) DEPRIVATION OF ESTOPPEL RIGHTS TORTS 34) nINJURY #VIII. INJURY DEPRIVATION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS TORTS 35) DEPRIVATION OF IMMUNITIES: 36) 42 USC 1983 SAYS THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE JUDHEGES ARE IMPLICAYTED RETROACTIVELY AFOR IT WAS WITHIN THEIR PURVIEW TO STOP THE CHARGES AND THEY ARROGANTLY CHOSE TO DENY SUCH. THIS IS AGAINST OUR SYSTEM 37) FELONY CHARGES attempted and later comitted FELONY CHARGES AGAINST THE WALTON COUNTY UNCHECKED BY 38) NO RULE 56 AT SUMMARY JUDGEMENT 39) OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICES 40) PRETEXTUAL INFORMATION MISLEDING INFORMATION EXTRINSIC FRAUDS 41) YEARS OF TAX RETURN UNDER FALSE PRETEXT AND THE WANTED FUGITIVE DID NOT HAVE TO SUPPLY ONE. THE PROTECTION OFFERED BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT HAS BEEN BREACHED. AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the 42) privileges or 43) immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of 44 ​life, 45) liberty, 46) property​, 47) without due process of law​;​ 48) nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. these are the attempted torts and the coomitted torts double this number as the violotiona were both attempted and committed in TORT LAWS 49) EXTRINSIC FRAUDS serious charges that invalidates an entire judgement 50) pretext a pretextual charge is frauds that vitiate a judgement like that of FRAUDS UPON THE COURT MISLEADING THE PLAINTIFF that he can ot find the truth about the case 51) forgery. this is of the utmost importance since it derails good judgment and causes everyboody to land in dobts of papers presented FOR THE WALTON COUNTY attempted and committed 52) USE FALSE PRETENSE AND PRETEXT TO OBSCURE THE TRUTH THERE WAS 53) miscarriage of justice. severe crime 54) Contumacious miscarriage of justice 55) malicious prosecution = or intentional TORTS THAT ARE CRIMES a) The malfeasance b) the misfeasance and the c) nonfeasance are enough to put this in the million counts HERE WE GO: 3 prongs above MULTIPLIED BY 36500 or ten years @ 365 days per year IS 109,500.00 TIMES TEN HARASSMENT IS = 1,O95,000 TIMES 62 INJURIES this is inmillions the mnore they obstructed God the more he bribgs the dirt to the surface Million 67,890,000 torts in just one tort alone and i have at least TORTS if we dare multiply these tort by the number of days i spebnt in shame then we canT counT THEM ANY MORE TIMES TEN FULL YEAR S OF SUFFEREING SO NO JURY TRIAL AFTER IT WAS DEMANDED BY LAW AND PROMISED BY LAW AND SCHEDULED ON FINAL ORDERS AND ABORTYED WITHOUT A NOTICE OF WAIVER THEREFORE THERE ARE TWO TORTS IN ONE 7) NO ONE THING IN AMERICA DESPITE OUR MOCKERY OF GOD ALMIGHTY HE LOVES US AND HE IS DESPERATE TO GIVE US A SECOND CHANCE BUT WE MUST REPENT SINCERELY AS HE WOOES US WITH HIS HOLY SPIRIT. AS I PROBED AMERICA AND MORE SPECIFICALLY THE STATE OF FLORIDA I REALIZED THAT WE ARE THE SAFEST NATION ON EARTH AND YET WE ARE PANICKY AND SKEPTICAL WE MUST LIFT UP OUR HEADS WITH PRIDE WE HAVE A GREAT PRESIDENT FOR THE FIRST TIME IN THE WORLD AMERICA IS PRESIDED OVER BY A BLACK MAN. we HAVE THE PREEMINENCE OF JUSTICE IN AMERICA AND THAT IS BY FAR. MEANING WE ARE A SUPERIOR NATION WITH OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM HERE IS WHAT UI COULD NOT UNDERSTAND FOLKS LISTEN IF WE ARE THE BEST AND MOST ADVANCED SHOULD WE NOT TRY TO BE MORE SYMPATHETETIC AND RESPONSIBLE BUT WE USURP EVEN THE POWER THT\THAT I NOT OUR TO HURT SOMEONE , AND FOR THAT I MENAS PEOPL IN AUTHORITY DO O A I TALKED RECEMTLY TO AN EX GNERAL OF THE ARMY THIS IS THE WORK OF PEOPLE ATTEMOTING TO GET EVEN WITH PRESIDENT OBAM OR ANYBODY AND HURTING OTHERS SINSESLY WELL, WELL, WELL. WHEN IT COMES TO JUSTICE PREEMINAENT WE ARE ALL SAFE AND THE PROTECTION WE OFFER IS FAR LESS THAN THE PROTECTION WE GIVE. THE PRESIDENT IS DOING A GREAT JOB AND WE MUST ALL FROM A BIPARTISAN STANDPOINT GIVE HIM AN APPLAUSE. INDEED WE UNDER PROMISE AND OVER DELIVER REGARDLESS OF WHAT THE CONTENDERS FOR THE PRESIDENCY ARE SAYING. GREAT INDEED IS THIS PROPHETIC COUNTRY ACCORDING TO REVELATION 13 IT LOOKS DOCILE LIKE A LAMB WHILE THE NAYSAYERS ARE RAGING IT LOOKS QUIET WHILE THE OPPOSING FORCES ARE TORMENTING THEMSELVES IT LOOKS SO WEAK AND INNOCENT WHILE THE DISSENTERS ARE TRAUMATIZING THE WORLD. BUT AT ONE POINT AMERICA WILL SPEAK LIKE A DRAGON ACCORDING TO REVELATION 13 AND THAT IS A PROPEHECY BEING FULFILLED EVEN NOW WE SPEAK AND NATIONS ARE IMMOBILIZED AMERICA, AMERICA GOD BLESS AMERICA GOD SHED HIS GRACE ON THEE. OH, SAY, CANT YOU SEE, OH BEAUTIFUL FOR PRECIOUS SKIES, gOD BLESS AMERICA. the 21 defendants of florida based on the ​wanted fugitive Charles Webb’s words, the Walton County, the State of Florida and the defendants co-conspirators of Walton County SET THEM SELVES UP IN A TRIANGLE OFFENSE AND IT WORKS AS FOLLOWS: PART 1) THE MAL FEASANCE DONE BY THE WALTON COUNTY BUT IT DOES NOT END THERE IN UNDERGROUND. THE LAWLESSNESS WENT ON TO HURT ME MORE HERE IS PART ii OF THE CAMOUFLAGE: MISFEASANCE AND THEN PRT III IS NON FEASANCE IF YOU HAVE THESE THREE PLAYING A ROLE IN ANYTHING THERE GOES YOUR CONSPIRACY CHARGES RIGHT THERE. THESE CLAIMS ARE DISPUTES I HAD FROM THE BEGINNING AND WERE OBSTRUCTED FROM COMING FORWARD.THIS COMPLAINTS WILL B PERCOLATE THE ENTIRE CYBERSPACE AND WILL REACH THE PRESIDENT FIRST BEFORE NY CONTITUEBTS AND I PRESENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS IF THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF VIEWS IT THAT WAY FOR HE TOOK AN OATH TO PROTECT THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND TO PROTECT YOU AND ME AND I WAS NOT PROTECTED AT ALL. I AM CRYNG WOLF NOT ON MY PRESIDENT BUT ON UNDERGRAOUND AMERICA THE LAWLESS ONE. WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THEY WERE LAWLESS MR. ROY DON’E YOU KNOW WHAT LAWLESS MEAN NR. ROY? I WILL ANSWER MY OWN QUESTION IN MANY WAYS. IN PROBING THE TEN MILLIONS VIOLATIONS I HAVE CURRENTLY I OBSERVED ALSO THAT NOBODY CAN FIND THAT MANY TORTS WITHOUT SOMEONE ELSE DOING SOMETHING TERRIBLY BAD. AND THAT WAS CONFIEMED AT THE DULLES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WHEN A WOMAN CAME TO ME AND TOLD ME THAT WAS SINPLY A GAME SO LET GO AND I TESTED HER I SAID DO YOU MEAN LET GO OF MY MONEY AND THE ANSWER WAS LOUD AND CLEAR YES FORGET IT THAT IS WHEN I REALIZE THE DEPTH OF IMBECILITY AND STUPIDITY THAT EXISTS IN MY CASE. PEOPLE’S MINDS WERE TOTALLY AND SCANDALOUSLY SHUT UP AND RIPPED APART AND THESE EMPTY HEADED NOMADS ALTHOUGH THEY WITNESSED MY NOSTALGIA WHICH IS NOT FUN FOR THE PAIN I ENDURED AND CONTINUE TO ENDURE BECAUSE OF MY MANEURISM THEY TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THAT TO HURT ME MORE THEY HAD NO SYMPATHY FOR ME AT ALL AND YET, THEY CLAIM TO BE FRIENDS BUT IN A NUTSHELL THEY WERE THE GREATEST FOES AND GOD SAW THEM HE WANTED ME TO KNOW WHO THEY WERE AND THE JOB WAS DONE. THE WAY THESE WOMEN TALKED ONE WOULD BE LED TO BELIEVE THAT I DID SOMETHING WRONG AND THE OTHER PEOPLE DID SOMETHING RIGHT. MY, MY, MY,. OH! LORD. ONE THING THAT THESE WOMEN NEVER PAID ATTENTION TO IN THE BIBLE IS THE HYPOTHESIS OF HYPNOSIS BY SATAN HE HYPNOTIZED SOMEONE AND BEGAN TO TAKE CONTROL OF THEIR MIND AND SOME AUTHORIIES ARE TRAINED TO DO THE SAME THING AND IF YOUARE MNOT CAREFUL THEY WILL TURN YOUR DAY INTO NIGHT AND YOUR DREAMS WILL BECOME NIGHTMARES ONE BODY GURD FRIOEND OF MINE DID THE SAME THING TO ME NOW FRIENDS AND I WROTE EXTINSIVELY ABOUT FRIENDSHIPS, JESUS IS THE FRIEND THAT STICKS CLOSER THAN A BROTHER A FRIED IS BORN FOR SDVERSITY MAKE NO MISTAKES ABOUT IT. A FRIEN THEY EVE WENT ON CONVERSING WITH THE DEVIL THE DEVIL WILL MWKE YOU THINK THT GOD IS WRONG AND HE IS RIOGHT WHAT DO YOU XPECT FROM DEMONS TO LOVE YOU TO CARE FOR YOU TO EXALTYOUR DREAM TO PLEASE YOU NO, VERILY NO. THE PURPOSE OF DEVILS IS TO DISCOURAGE YOU AND THAT WAS TAUGHT ME EARLY INLIFE THESE PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW HOW PRE[PARED I WAS. THEY ARE KICKING AGIST THE PRICKS AND I AM WRITING THIS PIECE RIGHT HERE FORM, I TELL THE TRUTH AND TO MY DEATH NO ONE CAN TAKE THAT FRON ME THE MOTION IS DIVIDED IN TEN PARTS and WILL NECESSITATE A QUALIFIED JUDGE TO end with the DEMANDS OF FINALITY. NO more DOCTRINE OF ATTRITION which makes me sick and tired. THE PURPOSE OF THIS MOTION; A.IS TO CONTINUE TO SEEK FINALITY B. TO DECLARE MY FINDING OF MORE THAN 1) TEN MILLIONS TORTS AFTER 2) TEN YEARS AND 3) TEN HARASSMENTS AND 4) TEN FRAUDS UPON THE COURT IN THE WHOLE CASE PENDING REVIEW BY QUALIFIED AUTHORITIES UNDER OATH AS I FOUND THEM AND MAKING ITS DIFFICULT WAY TO THE UNITED NATIONS AS WE SPEAK FOR THIS IS WAY TOO MUCH FOR OUR BUSY PRESIDENT WITH ALL THE DEMANDS FROM THE NAYSAYERS ACTING UP I UNDERSTAND HIS BUSINESS. I RESPECT THAT. C. TO ONCE MORE OR FOR THE FOURTH TIME REQUEST A COPY OF MY FILE AS I REQUESTED VEHEMENTLY BEFORE D.TO PURSUE FUNDINGS FOR MY TWELVE HOSPITALIZATIONS BILLS THAT ARE STAGGERING AT THIS TIME AND OTHER MAJOR INJURIES I SUFFERED TO STAY ALIVE BE IT DENTAL PHYSICAL MORAL AND DEPRIVATIONS E.TO BLOW THE WHISTLE AS I INTEND TO DO ON VIOLATIONS OF THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT F.TO BLOW THE WHISTLE ON DEFIANCE AGAINST RULE 56 BY THE FEDERAL JUDGES FOR NOT USING THE RULE AT ALL WHILE EXECUTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT :My Goal was a a.To buy a piece of property of $1.3 million dollars and i did b.TO obtain a development order like Mr. trump does always and I did c.To develop my land not obstructed by anyone else and I did d.to build the first CASTLE CITY DEVELOPMENT UNDER CHATEAUX DE PARIS and I did e. I have Realized A HEALTHY PROFIT of 600% in a short seven months RECORD BREAKING The Walton County placed its ears to the ground the commissioners would hear the hoofbeats of approaching horsemen or the Apocalypse of money-making on the Gulf of Mexico. g.To Fulfill God’s requirements for my life and I did 1.OCTOBER 2004 First SWO based on the FUGITIVE noncredible complaint 2.May 11, 2005 2nd SWO based on the FUGITIVE noncredible complaint 3.May 12, 2005 belated Written complaint by Ken Goldberg based on the FUGITIVE noncredible complaint 4.July 15, 2005 Extortion Charges, based on the FUGITIVE noncredible complaint 5.July 15, 2005 third SWO, based on the FUGITIVE noncredible complaint This is the jostling for supremacy of two Americas. Which one will take the lead depends on many factors but for one thing I am sure Nothing takes the led unless the Commander in Chief says so. Republicans can be agitated but the FBI plays no game and the systemic agencies of the AMERICA THAT LASTS demands justivce your OATH OF OFFICE guarantees protection of the United States Constitution, even when partisan annoyances emerge. Mr. President Finish Strong Through the Storm wa my manuscript waiting for my fuds to be published i was hospitalized twelve times in ten years and those saaggering bills must be paid aalong with all tests io was deprived of all muy funds by the walton county and i hve found after ten years two Americas the good one that you preside over and an underground America where people do as they please I demand an account to make sure i am living as you said in the AMERICA THAT LASTS AUTHORITATIVE CITATION:Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States." the 1964 civil rights act Title six is my talking point here and i will not bulge from there until the president realizes what is happening here i am hurt and I lost more than fifteen million dollars on u.s. soil due to what was said and many other things here . Per your action some years ago giving greater protection to WHISTLE BLOWERS, I am issuing to the United States Congress the same for your words were broken and the level of obstruction is high by this great conspiracy extraordinaire. by the Federal judges who told me the following on line:”the Roys own property in an area that HISTIORICALLY has been RACIALLY SEGREGATED (I called this (HRS)a sign should be placed in northern florida for all investors to beware of that area for this is (and I borrowed that word) this is PERNICIOUS. No human being in their right mind should go to Florida while the Condition have not met the standards of the AMERICA THAT LASTS in my view. all the people cooperating with the underground must meet the fate of underground that means the sanctuary of justice must take the appropriate actions and the number is staggering for i understand that according to rumors there are more than one thousand people involved with their cell phones and taking pictures I do not know if this is true for I have not been part of that world but very clearly the underground departed from Mainstream America to follow a different path and i am calling wolf before its too late. And they all are republicans that did this to my knowledge. the whole nation can get hurt as the high court took discretion and the district court judges are disqualified lost jurisdiction and issued order under a loss of jurisdiction that is grave for america unless you step in and regulate what has happened here. let us take the first issue, the 1964 civil rights act is the act theat the late Ronald reagan Stated on the world wide web that he would defend it at gu point and i believe you would too to my understanding it has been disparaged here by the non-marginal statement of two Federal judges as follows: AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: 1) ”Pleadings in this case are being filed by Plaintiff In Propria Persona, wherein pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicalities. Propria, pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as practicing lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner 92 S Ct 594, also See Power 914 F2d 1459 (11th Cir 1990), also See Hulsey v. Ownes 63 F3d 354 (5th Cir 1995). also See In Re: HALL v. BELLMON 935 F.2d 1106 (10th Cir. 1991)."#2) AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: In Puckett v. Cox, it was held that a pro-se pleading requires less stringent reading than one drafted by a lawyer (456 F2d 233 (1972 Sixth Circuit USCA). Justice Black in Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 at 48 (1957) "The Federal Rules rejects the approach that “pleading is a game of skill in which one misstep by counsel may be decisive to the outcome and accept the principle that the purpose of pleading is to facilitate a proper decision on the merits." According to Rule 8(f) FRCP and the State Court rule which holds that all pleadings shall be construed to do substantial justice." HERE is the list of salient pointS or torts as i promised : NOCREDIBILITY FROM A WANTED FUGITIVE. MY, MY ND MY AND I LOT MORE THAN FIOIFTEEN KMILLIONS DOLLARS This Complaint is divided into three counts for each TORT as I found during my ten years of great probe. count 1) MALFEASANCE< count 2) MISFEASANCE AND count 3) NONFEASABNNCE post. these will further be extrapolated by multiplying the number of days by the torts at hand and below I have exposed atleast 30 salient TORTS OF LAW IRREFUTABLE BY THE STANDARDS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, as new counts. It simply means Mr. president that each day that passes by America and more specifically the defendants of the South are incurring a greater and greater bill that is getting to be astronomical I had ten years in hios and i was obstructed from talking after i found extrinsic frauds at the start the presence of a wanted fugitive along is fraulent and the walton county to obstruct further never contacted the FBI OFFICE which made the whole matter more terryfying the systemic fbi was not called and an investigation a major investigation is going on. This is the plain nature of the civil side and the case becomes more acute from the criminal sides. unless your inherent powers intervene to veto this there will be a lot of problem s due to my injuries and I ite here the most salient points a. I lost over 15 millions dollars in appraised properties and some of the appraisers were deposed and they gave theyir reasons for appraising whatthey did. b.I lost affection with my wife of thirty five years and that was directly diue to the words of George R,. Mead to my wife and to her face stating after he plainly ws not prepared for the oral argument for he cared less that was not him you see. One law firm i contacted in Florida told me point blank they would start with my lawyer and cut him to shreds in court first. it should be noted that the chief judge went to defend my attorney nd the conivence mkes it the most appearent what was going on and how my foerafathers and ancesters died without knowing what hit them. The chief judge stated on one of her orders that should have been disqualified to my reccolection in the year 2011, also My lawyer stated did nothing wrong on the oder issued to me after i denounced the conflict of interest a PLEASE, DO NOT PAY ATTENTION TO THE TIME THERE ARE a) extrinsic frauds and frauds upon the court that trump all time for there are no statutes of limitation for FRAUDS. THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS BEYOND THE CONFESSED OVERSIGHT AT THE GET GO WAS FULL OF THEM. THEN, WE HAVE THE ALLEGED AND ASSERTED VIOLATIONS WHICH WERE LEFT IN DEFIANCE TO THE CONSTITUTION WITHOUT AS “FAILURE TO ANSWER” THE CHIEF JUDGE IS WELL AWARE OF THOSE rules and the danger of not answering a claim specially FRAUDS UPON THE COURT FOR THEY ARE TIMELESS AND CANNOT BE TRUMPED BY ANY STATUTEs OF LIMITATION. IT IS TIME TO TOWER with such a PREEMINENCE OF JUSTICE NOT COWER AS THOSE WHO HAVE NO LaWS AND NO CONSTITUTION. AMERICA LOOKS GREaT and SHARP WHEN ITS PEOPLE MAINTAIN the law, IT IS TIME TO GO FORWARD NOT TO BE STUCK. I AM NOT CALLING FOR ANY CORRECTIONS OR THE ANNER THE CORRECTIONS SHOULD TAKE EFFECT, NOT THIS IS THE JOB OF THE HIGH NOBLES. The presumption of innocence, sometimes referred to by the Latin expression Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat (the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies), is the principle that one is considered innocent unless proven guilty. In many nations, presumption of innocence is a legal right of the accused in a criminal trial, and it is also regarded as an international human right under the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 11. The burden of proof is thus on the prosecution, which has to collect and present enough compelling evidence to convince the trier of fact, who is restrained and ordered by law to consider only actual evidence and testimony that is legally admissible, and in most cases lawfully obtained, that the accused is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. If reasonable doubt remains, the accused is to be acquitted. Under Justinian Codes and English Common law, the accused is presumed innocent in criminal proceedings, and in civil proceedings (like breach of contract) both sides must issue proof. Under Anglo-American Common Law, the accused is always presumed innocent in all types of proceedings; proof is always the burden of the accuser. Under Islamic Law, a tradition had not been solidified but doubtful evidence should be rejected upon moral principles. i WILL NOT OVER LAY TEN MILLIONS TORTS HERE THAT WOULD BE BY ITSELF DEFAMING FOR THE SANCTUARY OF JUSTICE AND TO ALL. I LIMIT MY EXPOSE HERE TO THE MOST SALIENT, CRIMINAL OR/AND THE MOST RECURRING TORTS THE OVERAMPLIFIED VERSION WITH THE TEN MILLIONS TORTS IS RESERVED TO THOSE WHO CAN UNDERSTAND THE POWER OF COMPOUNDING LEST WE LOSE OUR HEADS IN EXTRAPOLATION AND QUANTUM DEVELOPMENTS. HERE ARE THE VIOLATIONS IN THE 1ST HARASSMENT DEPRIVED OF THE FOLLOWING. 2) TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 249 Hate Crimes Prevention Act AGINST RACE, COLOR, NATIONAL ORIGIN This statute makes it unlawful to willfully cause bodily injury—or attempting to do so with fire, firearm, or other dangerous weapon—when 1) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin of any person, or 2) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person and the crime affected interstate or foreign commerce or occurred within federal special maritime and territorial jurisdiction. The law also provides funding and technical assistance to state, local, and tribal jurisdictions to help them to more effectively investigate, prosecute, and prevent hate crimes. The law provides for a maximum 10–year prison term, unless death (or attempts to kill) results from the offense, or unless the offense includes kidnapping or attempted kidnapping, or aggravated sexual abuse or attempted aggravated sexual abuse. For offenses not resulting in death, there is a seven–year statute of limitations. For offenses resulting in death, there is no statute of limitations. I am CHARGING THE WALTON COUNTY FOR THREE COUNTS OF VIOLATION AGAINT ME IN THIS CASE TAKING 19 DEFENDANTS COMMITTING THAT ACT CAUSED ME TO LOSE MY WIFE OF 35 YEARS AND MY WELATH OF MORE THAN 15, MIIdollars on the Gulf oF MexIco AND ALL MY RIGHTS AS A UNITED STATES CITIZEN> THE TWO JUDGES WILL BE INCLUDED IF THEY STUBBORNLY REFUSE TO ADHERE WITH CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.21 DEfEndants by 62 injuries times thr “pleading is NOT A game of skill in which one misstep by counsel may be decisive to the outcome” WHY DO I ENOHASIZE THIS. RECENTLY I HEARD THE SAME FOR THESE PEOPLE WERE BENT ON ME LOOSING MY CASE TO COLLECT FROM SOMEBODY. 1.NO CREDIBILITY IOS A FRAULENT CASE ALL THE WAY THAT IS AN EXTRINSIC FRAUIDS CHARACTERIZING THE ENTIRE CASE AS FRAUDS AND THAT STARTED IN 2005 TO MY RECOLLECTION THEREFORE I DECRETE THIS CASE FRAUDS EXTRINSIC FRAUDS AND NO NEED FOR UNDERGROUND TO DPOME WITH ANY NEW RULINGS THE CASE IS FRAUD. WE VENTURE TO SAY AND FOR GOOD CAUSE “Sticks and stones can break my bones but words cannot hurt me” and we applaud preachers on the pulpit when they come up with wise sayings but, in my case it did not work at all. i wish the sticks and the stones would break my bones but it was the words of a Wanted AND UNINVESTIGATED Fugitive that hurt more than the words of a wise person and my father was a wise man who in six short years taught me everything I needed to know about life almost except what i contributed TO it myself. This is a A MULTIPLIER AND A recurring tort for the entire PROCESS 13) ​NO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS​ BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT THE SHORT LIST OF ALL SALIENT TORTS PERTAINING TO ALL HARASSMENT AND THE FRAUDS UPON THE COURT ALLEGED AGAINST THE FEDERAL JUDGES AND LEFT UNANSWERED SINCE 2011 FROM THE HARASSMENT CHARGES THAT HAPPENED ON OCTOBER 2004 TO THE IMPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL JUDGES RETROACTIVELY. THE CHIEF FEDERAL JUDGE WAS WITHIN HER PURVIEW TO STOP THE CHARGES AND THEY ARROGANTLY CHOSE TO DENY AVERYTHING AND ENTERED SUMNMARY JUDGEMENT WITHOUT RULE 56 ND REFUSED TO REOPEN WITH RULE 60BBEING FROM THE SOUTH TO MY UNDERSTANDING. IF THE SANCTUARY OF JUSTICE REFUSED TO DISCIPLINE AND CORRECT THE WRONG DONE TO OUR IMAGE AS A COUNTRY HERE, MAY BE THE UNITED NATIONS WILL BE BETTER SUITED FOR THAT TASK. SUCH. THIS IS AGAINST OUR SYSTEM IN AMERICA. HERE ARE THE SALIENT VIOLATIONS IN ALL THE HARASSMENTS WITHOUT THE FOLLOWING: 1.NO CREDIBILITY WE VENTURE TO SAY AND FOR GOOD CAUSE WHAT CREDIBILITY EXISTS IN THE WORDS OF A WANTED AND UNINVESTIGATED FUGITIVE WITHOUT THE PARTICIPATION OF THE FBI, THE DA OFFICE, THE HUD THE DOJ THE FCC, THE HOMELAND SECURITY, THE WHOLR GINJNIT OF INVESTIGATIVE EXPERTS WAS MISSED FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF ABSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE THSI IS CRAZY WHILE I LOOSE MORE THAN FIFTEEN MIILION AND I LOST AFFECTION WITH MY WIFE OF 35 YEARS AND I LOST ALL NY RIGHTS INCLUDING MY HUMAN RIGHTS AND MY FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND THE JUDGES SINPLY ARE WAITING FOR THE NEXT PREYS IN AMERICA THA DOE NOT MAKE ANY SENSE UNDER GOD’S HEAVEN. iT IS VER HARD FOR ANY BLACK MAN TO SUCCEED IN AMERICA EVEN THE THE AMERICA THAT LASTS LET ALONE THE UNDERGROUND AND THE LAWLESS AMERICA AND SOME IS TELLING ME TO ACCEPT SUCH IN THE MAERICA THAT ;ASTS. THAT IS UNDERGROUND STUFF AND I DETEST THAT IT CAUSED MY TOTAL DEMNISE AND THE CAMOUGFLGE I AHAVE BEEN HEARING IS EVEN GROSSER HERE IS ONE AND IF THOSE PEOPLE DO NOT STOP I ATTEMPTING TO SABOTAGE THE LEGAL LIVELIHOOD OF AN AMERICAN CITISZEN THAT HURTS I WAS TERRIBLY HURT BY THAT. THAT WAS NOT CALLED FOR IF YOU ARE AT THE WALTON COUNTY GOD IS NOT PLEASED AT ALL “Sticks and stones can break my bones but words cannot hurt me” and we applaud preachers on the pulpit when they come up with wise sayings but, in my case it did not work at all. i wish the sticks and the stones would break my bones but it was the words of a Wanted Fugitive that hurt more than the words of a wise person and my father was a wise man who in six short years taught me everything I needed to know about life almost except what i contributed in it my self. This is a A MULTIPLIER AND A recurring tort for the entire PROCESS 6) NO PROBABLE CAUSE: obstruction of justice all the way. Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant. Courts usually find probable cause when there is a reasonablebasis for believing that a crime may have been committed (for an arrest) or when evidence of the crime is present in the place to be searched (for a search). Under exigent circumstances, probable cause can also justify a warrantless search or seizure. Persons arrested without a warrant are required to be brought before a competent authority shortly after the arrest for a prompt judicial determination of probable cause. 7) NO FBI INVOLVED : THE GREATEST AGENCY TO INVESTIGATE A MATTER IN THE AMERICAN SYSTEM WAS AVAILABLE AND SKIPPED. that was the fbi that was tghe time to show the world what our agencies coulds do. THE FBI WAS NOT CONTACTED AT ALL. 8) obstruction of justice the plaintiff had no recourse while loosing more than fifteen million dollars on us. Soil. Not the same as no justice I may skippe Justce anbnd I may obstruxt Justice and that are not the same things. 9) NO HOMELAND SECURITY 10)NO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 9) NO WARRANT TO SEARCH 10) NO SEARCH 11) NO NOTICES ACCORDING TO THE FOURTH AMENDMENT INJURY OVERSIGHT NO INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 9) NO HOMELAND SECURITY 10)NO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 9) NO WARRANT TO SEARCH 10) NO SEARCH 11) NO NOTICES ACCORDING TO THE FOURTH AMENDMENT 12) NO HUMAN RIGHTS REGARDED as stated by the United nations where Our President Appears often if the UN gets a hold of my post we are fried for the UN will not stand for our violations especially when they have to face more than 130 nations and answer to them as the ir Constituents. ​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result is 14724+ 1302= 16,026 TORTS Carried forward 13) ​NO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS​ BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT 14) ​NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS 15) ​MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE​ 16) CONTUMACIOUS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE 17 ) DISCRIMINATION DUE TO RACE, COLOR, NATIONAL ORIGIN BIAS EXISTING in the area is a major conflict of LAW, banned by the 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS and known by the Judges at the start. That judgment dated 3/31/2009, should be set aside and the case should be reopened for quick finality without further litigations. 18) MAJOR OVERSIGHT TORT 17​) ​In 2012 SCOTT BRANNON - COMPELLING VIOLATION: 18) NO JUSTICE NEITHER THE APPEARANCE OF JUSTICE 19) NO GOVERNMENT INTEREST TO WARRANT SUCH CARELESSNESS 20) NO STATE INTEREST TO BACKUP SUCH EGREGIOUS BEHAVIOR 21) RACKETEERING CHARGES 22)​MALICIOUS PROSECUTION 23) NO IMPARTIAL ARBITER 32654 TORTS Carried forward 24) I CLAIM AN ENTRY OF DEFAULT 25​) NO SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS 26) NO PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS ALSO 28) NO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAWS​. 29) ​EXTRINSIC FRAUDS:. 30) INJURY)multipliers DEPRIVATION OF MY CIVIL 31) INJURY) DEPRIVATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 32) INJURY #VI. ) ) DEPRAVATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TORTS 33) INJURY #VII) DEPRIVATION OF ESTOPPEL RIGHTS TORTS 34) nINJURY #VIII. INJURY DEPRIVATION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS TORTS 35) DEPRIVATION OF IMMUNITIES: 36) 42 USC 1983 SAYS THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE JUDHEGES ARE IMPLICAYTED RETROACTIVELY AFOR IT WAS WITHIN THEIR PURVIEW TO STOP THE CHARGES AND THEY ARROGANTLY CHOSE TO DENY SUCH. THIS IS AGAINST OUR SYSTEM 37) FELONY CHARGES attempted and later comitted FELONY CHARGES AGAINST THE WALTON COUNTY UNCHECKED BY 38) NO RULE 56 AT SUMMARY JUDGEMENT 39) OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICES 40) PRETEXTUAL INFORMATION MISLEDING INFORMATION EXTRINSIC FRAUDS 41) YEARS OF TAX RETURN UNDER FALSE PRETEXT AND THE WANTED FUGITIVE DID NOT HAVE TO SUPPLY ONE. THE PROTECTION OFFERED BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT HAS BEEN BREACHED. AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the 42) privileges or 43) immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of 44 ​life, 45) liberty, 46) property​, 47) without due process of law​;​ 48) nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. these are the attempted torts and the coomitted torts double this number as the violotiona were both attempted and committed in TORT LAWS 49) EXTRINSIC FRAUDS serious charges that invalidates an entire judgement 50) pretext a pretextual charge is frauds that vitiate a judgement like that of FRAUDS UPON THE COURT MISLEADING THE PLAINTIFF that he can ot find the truth about the case 51) forgery. this is of the utmost importance since it derails good judgment and causes everyboody to land in dobts of papers presented FOR THE WALTON COUNTY attempted and committed 52) USE FALSE PRETENSE AND PRETEXT TO OBSCURE THE TRUTH THERE WAS 53) miscarriage of justice. severe crime 54) Contumacious miscarriage of justice 55) malicious prosecution = or intentional TORTS THAT ARE CRIMES 48 torts times 48 torts Plus 48 is 96 96 torts times obstruction as a multiplier is 96 more 0r 192 192 torts times extrinsinc frauds is 192 torts times 2 or 384 torts 384 torts times pretextual torts is the number multiplied by two or 768 torts 768 torts times forgery two is the quantity above times two or 1526 TORTS 1526 torts times false pretense and misleading lies 3052 3052 times miscarriage of justice two miscarriage of justice is 6104 torts 6104 times two for contumacious miscarraiage of justice or 12, 208. 12208 times the injuries which are 62 = 12208x 62= 756 896 so far now we have ten harassments and the others have more charges 6) NO PROBABLE CAUSE: obstruction of justice all the way. 7) NO FBI INVOLVED : THE GREATEST AGENCY TO INVESTIGATE A MATTER IN THE AMERICAN SYSTEM WAS AVAILABLE AND SKIPPED. 8) obstruction of justice the plaintiff had no recourse while loosing more than fifteen million dollars on us. Soil. Not the same as no justice I may skippe Justce anbnd I may obstruxt Justice and that are not the same things. 756896 x 10 is 7, mill ion 568 thousand plus we have the ten frauds upon the court Coming Up. And all the other torts of attempted and committed such as the attempted muder by all the defendants these torts were committed and attempted by the entire conspiracy and i believe when it all said and done we may have 12 or thirteen millions I will continue this harduous work for torts are like products in the store and when they can be validated they carry their own values. NEVER A DO VIOLATED ON MAY 12 2005 WITH THE FOLLOWING # 41190 - 400090 SUCH DO DOENS NOT EXIST FOR THE DO RETIRED ON MAY 5, 2005 HOW COULD IT REAPPEAR ON MAY 12 BY KEN GOLDBERG AN UNINSURED ATTORNEY WHO LIED UNDER OATH ALSO AFTER REGISTERING THE CABAL AND SEALING A DEAL WITH MY THEN ATTORNEY THE DEAL FAILED THROUGH AND MY ATTORNEY WAS FIRED BY ME AND I WAS FURIOUS AS AI DO NOT WANT TO SEE HIM AT ALL HE STOLE MY CONFIDENCE AND ALL THE THINGS I DISCUSSED WHIM I UNDERSTAND BECAME PUBLIC INFORMATION.. THIS IS A LEGAL RIP OFF AND I DO NOT WANT ANY PART IN A RIP OFF THE STATE IF WHAT THE FEDERAL JUDGES SAID IS CORRECT MUST CLEAN ITSELF AND i WAS IN TOUCH WITH THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE DEMANDING THE SAME i DO NOT KNOW WHAT HAS BEEN DONE BUT I BLEW THE WHISTLE AND IMMEDIATELY SOMEONE ANSWERED AND STOPPED. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS CLEANED AND OUR SYSTEM IS SIGHT WE THE PREEMINENCE BUT LIKE DR. DEMING STATED SOMEONE IS ATTEMPTING TO PENETRATE 15% WITH 85% DISORDERS AND SUCH AS I LEARNED IN SCHOOL DOES NOT WORK. THE PEOPLE THAT ORCHESTRATE THE LEADERSHIP MUST TAKE CHARGE AND PRESENT A NEW SANCTUARY OF JUSTICE CLEANSED TOO MUCH DEFILEMENTS WENT THOU TOO MANY VIOLATIONS WENT IN TOO MANY TRANSGRESSION AND WE NEED TO DO IT RIGHT AWAY FOR THESE NAYSAYERS ARE WAITING FOR LOOPHOLES TO CONTINUE THEIR SENSELESS 4) NO REMORSE: ​this is a multipLier for to this day no one has called me or emailed me to say they’RE SORRY AND SOME ARE TRYING TO HURT ME MORE BY PLACING MY NAME ON A LIST TO DEFAME ME AND DEFAMATION IS A RECURRING VIOLATIONS AND A CRIME ALSO. REMORSELESSLY AND RECKLESSLY AND NO ONE STEPPED FORWARD TO APOLOGIZE TO ME DESPITE THE BLATANT FACTS. NOT EVEN A LETTER OF EXCUSE WAS ISSUED TO EXPRESS THE SORROW AND THE PAINS INFLICTED THAT WAS TERRIBLE. ​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result is 3,906 + 1302 carried forward so far 5,208 Torts of law with offer of proof 5) NO INVESTIGATION AT ALL A MULTIPLIER AND A RECURRING TORT. tHROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE PROCEEDING MY CASE HAS BEEN BUTCHERED AS THOUGH gOD’S HANDS VEERED THE HANDS OF MAN AND THEIR MINDS NOT TO SEE THAT THEY WERE HURTING ME. fORGIVENESS DOES NOT EXEMPT THE CRUCIFIX OF THE OFFENSE. (MAJOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE TO PROTECT THE WANTED FUGITIVE) ​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result i 1302 + 5208 = 6,510 TORTS carried forward so far ​Read more: ​http://fullformdirectory.in/fir.html#ixzz3oegvHPTY . i AM SO GLAD THAT GOD DOES NOT CHANGE. 6) NO PROBABLE CAUSE: THIS IS A MULTIPLIER AND A RECURRING TORT hOW CAN WE DO ANY THING IN THE US WITHOUT THAT THE FIRST THING WE MuST SEEK IS TO HAVE PROBABLE CAUSE ESPEVCCIALLY WHEN SO MUH MONEY WAS INVOLVED. AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: THIS IS NOT A GAME. ​The ​Fourth Amendment of the ​U.S. Constitution provides, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against ​unreasonable searches and seizures​, shall not be violated, and no ​Warrants shall issue, but upon ​probable cause​, supported by ​Oath or affirmation,(ADDED NOTICE) ​LADIES AND GENTLEMEN IF THERE IS NO WARRANT ISSUED THERE CANNOT BE ANY SEARCH DONE FOR IT OS THE WARRANT THAT ​TELLS SOMEONE WHAT AND WHERE TO SEARCH and particularly describing the place to be ​searched​, and the persons or things to be ​seized​." THE WALTON COUNTY DOES NOT EVEN HAVE A SCINTILLA OF EVIDENCE OF WHAT THE COMMISSIONERS ACCUSED ME OF. THEY TURNED ME AROUND AND MADE ME GUILTY BY MASQUERADING THE CASE AND USING PRETEXTUAL TACTICS AND THE DOCTRINE OF ATTRITION. THEY OBSTRUCTED THE JUICE IN JUSTICE AND HAVE DONE THE WORST THING IN HISTORY NEVER BEFORE DID ANY COUNTY DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THAT IS WHY GOD TOLD ME TO LET THEM CONTINUE TO ENTANGLE THEMSELVES. FRANKLY I DO NOT KNOW WHY FEDERAL JUDGES GOT INVOLVED IN SUCH A MESS. WITH MOITRE THAN TEN MILLION VIOLATION ALL I CAN SAY IS ​“TO GOD BE THE GLORY (MAJOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE TO PROTECT THE WANTED FUGITIVE) ​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result i 6,510.00 + 1302 or = 7,812 TORTS Carried forward so far Read more:​ ​http://fullformdirectory.in/fir.html#ixzz3oegvHPTY 7) NO FBI INVOLVED THIS IS SERIOUS. ANOTHER MULTIPLIER AND A RECURRING TORT. FOR THE U.S. GOVERNMENT INCORPORATED THE fbi AS PART OF THE SYSTEM TO INVESTIGATE ALL THINGS AND IT WAS AVAILABLE BUT NOT USED (THE FBI WAS AVAILABLE TO THE COUNTY AND THE JUDGES AND THE STATE OF FLORIDA BUT WAS NEVER CONTACTED)​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result 7812 TORTS + 1302 9114.00 TORTS Carried forward so far 8) NO HOMELAND SECURITY MY CASE WA LOST IN AMERICA. ANOTHER AGENCY UNSUSED AND ABVAILABLE TO ALL. they weRE never EVEN CONTACTED FURTHER OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE)​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result i 9,114. + 1302 = 10,416.00 TORTS Carried forward so far 8) NO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WE ARE DEALING WITH THE 1964 cIVIL rIGHTS aCT AND THE doj IS NOT CONTACTED ? NOT EVEN INVOLVED For an investigation in the charges against me or WHILE THE 1964 cIVIL RIGHTS WAS INVOLVED the DOJ was available but was never contacted that is systemic and holding WE HAVE BUILT THESE AGENCIES AS PART POF OUR SSYSTEM TO DEFEND AMERICA AGAINST IMNTRUDERS THEREFORE MY NAME SHOULD COME UP FOR INVESTIGATION AND SOME ONE WOULD HAVE SAID HOLD IT THIS MAN IS A MINISTER OF THE GOSPEL. BUT, NONE OF THAT. 21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result is 2604+ 1302 + Carried forward = 10,416.00 + 1302 = 11718 TORTS carriefd forwrad so far 9) NO WARRANT TO SEARCH AUTHORITTATIVE CITATION: ​The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the people's right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, which often -- but not always -- means that government agents must have a warrant to search and seize your person and property. Here is the full text of the Fourth Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by ​Oath or affirmatio​n, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. The Fourth Amendment protects the people from ​unreasonable searches and seizures, which means that many searches are fine as long as they meet certain requirements. Searches are generally considered reasonable when: 1) a judge issues a search warrant based on probable cause; or 2) certain situations occur that justify a search without a warrant (a search for weapons after an arrest, for example). - See more at: http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-rights/search-warrant-requirements.html#sthash.sqPyEVO3.dpuf 21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result is 11718 + 1302 = 12020 TORTS Carried forward 10) NO SEARCH (a) if there were no warrant how can there be a search? it is the court warrant that tells what to search or what to seize or what to condemn. without the Warrant from an ​Impartial Arbiter such as Our Court System there cannot be a search (b) the two dispatched workers from the county members of this cabal stated during deposition that they premeditated what to do on their way to my location. they never searched. as they did not need to. ​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result is 12020.00 + 1302 = 13322 TORTS Carried forward 11) NO NOTICES or not ​supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. - See more at: http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-rights/search-warrant-requirements.html#sthash.sqPyEVO3.dpuf​the fourth amendment states that a notice should be issued to the person accused they did the reverse and eliminated the required process to do their own thing with issue of proof at the District Court. ​21 defendants multiplied by 62 injuries the result is 13322.00 + 1302 = 14724 TORTS Carried forward facebook.com No. 9 The Rights of No. 10 The Rights of the Child No. 12 The Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination NoNo. 11 Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions (Rev.1) (Rev.1) Forms of Slavery injuries VIOLATION OF THE 13th AMENDMENT No. 14 Contemporary No. 15 Civil and Political Rights: 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT No. 16 The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Rev.1) No. 17 The Committee against Torture No. 18 Minority No 19 National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights Rights (Rev.1) No. 20 Human Rights and Refugees The Human Rights Committee (Rev.1)No. 13 International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights No. 21 The Right to Adequate Housing (Rev.1) No. 22 Discrimination against Women: The Convention and the Committee No. 23 Harmful Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children No. 24 The International Convention on Migrant Workers and its Committee (Rev.1) No. 27 Seventeen Frequently Asked Questions about United Nations Special RapporteurNo. 30 The United Nations Human Rights Treaty System (Rev.1) No. 28 The Impact of Mercenary Activities on the Right of Peoples to Self- determination s No. 29 Human Rights Defenders: Protecting the Right to Defend Human Rights No. 35 The Right to Water No. 34 The Right to Adequate Food No. 33 Frequently Asked Questions on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights No. 32 Human Rights, Terrorism and Counter-terrorism No. 31 The Right to Health ) Indigenous Peoples (Rev.1) Human Rights Treaties (Rev.2) Disappearances (Rev.3) No. 4 Combating Torture (Rev.1) No. 3 Advisory Services and Technical Cooperation in the Field of Human Rights (Rev.1) No. 2 The International Bill of Human Rights (Rev.1) 1 * Fact sheets Nos. 1, 5 and 8 are no longer issued. All fact sheets are available online from www.ohchr.org. 46 The Human Rights Fact Sheet series is published by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, United Nations Office at Geneva. It deals with selected questions of human rights that are under active consideration or are of particular interest. Human Rights Fact Sheets are intended to assist an ever-wider audience in better understanding basic human rights, what the United Nations is doing to promote and protect them, and the international machinery available to help realize those rights. Human Rights Fact Sheets are free of charge and distributed worldwide. Tort of law the days must be counted 3650 days bring us to mAY 11 2015 we must calculate from May 11, 2015 to Niovember 3 2015 7 months a 30 days is 210 days o counts. on top of the 3650 days or 3, 860.00 days times 55 torts Pro Se litigants – In Propria Persona Non-Lawyer pro se litigants not to be held to same standards as a practicing lawyer Many pro se litigants will use this in their pleadings; “Pleadings in this case are being filed by Plaintiff In Propria Persona, wherein pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicalities. Propria, pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as practicing lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner 92 Sct 594, also See Power 914 F2d 1459 (11th Cir1990), also See Hulsey v. Ownes 63 F3d 354 (5th Cir 1995). also See In Re: HALL v. BELLMON 935 F.2d 1106 (10th Cir. 1991).” In Puckett v. Cox, it was held that a pro-se pleading requires less stringent reading than one drafted by a lawyer (456 F2d 233 (1972 Sixth Circuit USCA). Justice Black in Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 at 48 (1957) “The Federal Rules rejects the approach that pleading is a game of skill in which one misstep by counsel may be decisive to the outcome and accept the principle that the purpose of pleading is to facilitate a proper decision on the merits.” According to Rule 8(f) FRCP and the State Court rule which holds that all pleadings shall be construed to do substantial justice.” there was no justice nor the appearance of justice and the one sent to harass ne at the airport stated that it was a game the JUDGES WERE PLAYING. a) The malfeasance b) the misfeasance and the c) nonfeasance are enough to put this in the million counts HERE WE GO: 3 prongs above MULTIPLIED BY 3,860 or ten years plus 210 days @ 365 days per year IS 11, 580.00 TIMES TEN HARASSMENTs IS = 115.800.00 TIMES 62 INJURIES this is in millions 7,179,600 the more they obstructed God the more He brought the dirt to the surface Million 7,179, 600 then that must be multiplied by two for attempted and coommitted torts the first 7 179 600 is for attempted TORTS then the second amount is for committed TORTS 14, 359, 200 tort. the value per book for easch TORT is between 100 to 300 thousand dollars meaning that if i were to mulptiply that amount by the value of TORTS taking the lowest 100,000 pertort the total amoUnt would be too great for any court of law to bear on my way to law school I requested settlement instead of a computation of ALL THE torts trillion $1 435 920 000 000 THE u.s. WOULD NOT HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO PAY ME EVEN AT THE LOWEST VALUE God just did it again HE opened the red sea and the steps crossing were too much for Moses to beaR. http://www.goneviral.com/GY7R